The president of Mexico on Thursday expressed hope that Google “reconsiders” its decision to change its online maps to reflect U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that he has the authority to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order announcing he was changing the name of the body of water to the Gulf of America.

For U.S. users of Google Maps, the gulf was listed as the Gulf of America as of Thursday. Google, whose CEO attended Trump’s inauguration along with other tech moguls, said last month it has “a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources.”

But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday that her government “will file a civil suit” against Google if it does not revert back to labeling the international body of water the Gulf of Mexico.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    It was changed by executive order, which the president has the authority to do. Google doesn’t get to go “nuh-uh” and keep it the same.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 days ago

        If you want to know more about how the US government works, I’m not the person to educate you.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            You can argue with strangers on the Internet as much as you like, but the fact is, the US president can and has changed the name of multiple geographic features, and arguing with me won’t change that.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 days ago

              Oh, you’ve been caught being dumb and your story is changing.

              First it was “the government”, now it’s “the president”.

              That’s not how America works, lol. Naming things is a legislative responsibility. Trump can sign as many executive orders as he wants, but it isn’t official without an act of congress and a chance for the judiciary to object.

              • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                potus is the “head of government”. Would you prefer @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee to write “head of government of the USA has changed the name”?

                give them a break!

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  That would be less inaccurate, lol.

                  And no. I’ll be a pedantic asshole to anyone who pretends that Trump is anything other than one of President Musk’s assistants.

                  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    i feel your pain and disillusionment but it is what it is. The real “asshole” is changing the world with his Sharpie.

                    Good luck to you for the next 4 years

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Yes, and Congress delegated that authority in 1947 via Public Law 242, creating the US Board on Geographic Names, under the Secretary of the Interior, part of the executive branch. The President has the authority to direct the Secretary.

                You can speak as confidently as you like, but you’re still wrong. Feel free to learn: https://www.usgs.gov/us-board-on-geographic-names

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Did you not read the page you linked?

                  That org was “established in its present form by Public Law in 1947 to maintain uniform geographic name usage throughout the Federal Government.”

                  It’s a standards-setting org that resolves differences between other agencies of the government when there is disagreement about a place name, it isn’t entitled to rename things everyone was already in agreement about, lol~

                  • catloaf@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Yes, it sets the official name of each place. That’s what everyone here is talking about.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                The president is part of the government, they’re not two separate entities.

                And once again, there is nothing to be gained by arguing with me about this.

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  You underestimate how much I enjoy arguing with people on the internet, lol.

                  So is this your admission that your earlier statement was false, or are you still pretending that “part of” is the same thing as “all”?

                  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    He’s the part of the government that has the power to unilaterally change the name of a location.

    • Breve@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Why didn’t they change it only in the US and not elsewhere? Could you imagine the uproar if Google censored Tiananmen Square world wide because of the Chinese government?

      PS: Yes it was modified for everyone outside the US too. I am not American but your “president” is now allowed to change what name I have to call something?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Because Google is a US company, and not in a position to tell the US government to take a walk, that’s why.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          I mean, they are to an extent. The laws of the US are ostensibly supposed to allow citizens to call things whatever they want. If the government wants to throw a hissy fit and say the constitution is meaningless after all, let them do it. At least then we could give up all of the pretense that they are supposed to care about what it says.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            to allow citizens to call things whatever they want.

            I very much doubt that privilege extends to a mapmaker

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              Why wouldn’t it? Google’s just a company, not an arm of the government. At best, maybe there is some sort of accreditation process to have their maps called “authentic” or “accurate” or whatnot, but I’ve never heard of any US law that penalizes the publication of an inaccurate map.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Are you seriously suggesting nothing whatsoever would happen if Google just didn’t update their maps to the new name?

                • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  I’m suggesting that if Trump wants to cross the Rubicon, let Trump be the one to cross it. No need to meet him on the other side first.

                  In theory yes, Google should face no consequences for publishing an inaccurate map. There’s actually an old tradition of publishing maps with at least 1 inaccuracy in order to catch forgeries, which has never been a legal issue in the US. It shouldn’t be any more controversial than a published document choosing to call Jerusalem “Al-Quds”

                  In practice, I imagine Trump will throw a tantrum and try to argue that Google doesn’t have the right to say no to him. And if that’s the stance he wants to take, disregarding the constitutional protections that Google ought to have, let his administration waste time and resources arguing that in the courts. If he wins, then we can all stop pretending the constitution means anything, and if he loses, it’s a blow to his ego, resources wasted, and we can turn the focus on other companies to say they have an ethical obligation to change the names back.

        • Breve@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Did the US government tell Google to censor Tiannamen Square, or are they a global company that has to observe more than the whims of a single country?

          I hope other countries start renaming the US soon.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Tianamen square shows up just fine on Google maps, who is supposedly censoring them?

            • Breve@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Travel to Beijing, open up Google search, and see if it gives you any historically accurate results about what happened there.

              I’m serious, it sounds like you could use a lesson in freedom and the world outside your country.