We cannot lower carbon emissions if we keep producing steel with fossil fuels.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    That’s… Not how new steel production works.

    Coal is a significant component in the production of steel to impregnate it with carbon. It’s a fundamental part of how a blast furnace operates. The article literally talks about this…

    Even the article about doesn’t mention an alternative. An arc furnace relies on scrap it cannot make new steel.

    Though, I wonder if we can move more towards charcoals, but even then I wonder if that’s just much less effective or if it cannot reach the temperatures or concentrations required for industrial processes.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      How much of the coal in a blast furnace is actually necessary for the carbon impregnation, as opposed to supplying the heat via combustion? Steel contains only a few percent carbon by weight, so it doesn’t seem like much carbon is needed (not to mention that the carbon in steel is essentially sequestered).

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      The hybrit process that some Swedish steelmakers (including SSAB - not a typo, it isn’t Saab) are using looks promising. They’ve been testing it with Volvo and are apparently making it part of Volvo’s regular process in 2026