D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · 4 months ago

We've barely managed to make a tiny dent

lemmy.blahaj.zone

message-square
144
fedilink
564

We've barely managed to make a tiny dent

lemmy.blahaj.zone

FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · 4 months ago
message-square
144
fedilink
  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    where did you get this data? it can’t possibly be right

    edit: it’s robbed of context. it’s only illustrating water use in the Colorado River basin, and even at that is being misleading: for instance, corn silage is a byproduct of grain corn. that water doesn’t magically re-enter the water table if we don’t feed it to cattle, but by feeding it to cattle, we are able to reclaim some of that water use.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The NY Times. Here’s a gift link:

      https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/22/climate/colorado-river-water.html?unlocked_article_code=1.lE4.44Qi.Vu9I48wSDsmh&smid=url-share

      Edit: they cite this study in Nature Sustainability: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-0483-z

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I found the nature article that is the source.

        here

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      They said water in the American west then showed an image of water use. Critical thinking gooooooo

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s kinda bizarre how people are brainwashed to think that this isn’t a thing…

      https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/devastating-water-footprint-animal-agriculture/163485/

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I skimmed this and clicked a few of the references. it does use poore-nemecek 2018, so I’m skeptical of all of the other data that’s included. of course going through a piece the size that you linked to evaluate it for its scientific integrity is a project all onto itself and I’m at work at the moment. I encourage you to look at the methodology for each of the claims made in your link.

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 610 users / day
  • 1.86K users / week
  • 3.87K users / month
  • 9.92K users / 6 months
  • 8 local subscribers
  • 6.53K subscribers
  • 6.45K Posts
  • 26.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7@slrpnk.net
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org