But they can be checked and balanced by other moderators unless it’s a one mod/one admin system; in which case then it’s just a personal fief. Where’s the checks and/or balances for theftbox moderation?
Y’know, if I had a physical watch, I’d be looking at my wrist really condescendingly right now.
I sure as shit wouldn’t. Did you even read any of what frauddogg just said? Genuine question because they explained pretty clearly why it is a terrible and stupid idea.
What if it worked 90%? It doesn’t need to be perfect, just better.
I’d like to see an experiment.
An injustice against one of us is an injustice against all of us. 90% isn’t good enough. Hell, 99% isn’t good enough.
But human moderators aren’t perfect either. And they are often biased.
But they can be checked and balanced by other moderators unless it’s a one mod/one admin system; in which case then it’s just a personal fief. Where’s the checks and/or balances for theftbox moderation?
Y’know, if I had a physical watch, I’d be looking at my wrist really condescendingly right now.
AIs can be checked too. And judged, tweaked, etc. Obviously
Groups of moderators can be just as biased as individual moderators. More so even. Given the amplifying effects of echo chambers.
deleted by creator
I sure as shit wouldn’t. Did you even read any of what frauddogg just said? Genuine question because they explained pretty clearly why it is a terrible and stupid idea.
Yes I read it. I just don’t think it significates.
And this is something you should reexamine about yourself then if you don’t understand the significance of racism and other bigoted biases in AI.
I am pretty much done arguing with you because you’re a creep and a troll.
Nice word-a-day calender, creepazoid
You don’t even want to see an experiment? But that’s the pudding.
I repeat. Did you actually read any of the concrete argument laid out before you or are you just being willfully obtuse.
deleted by creator