LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 15 days agoBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down12
arrow-up1141arrow-down1imageBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareFisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·14 days agoPlus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 days agoImma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun. See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
minus-squareoptional@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoWhat about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 days agoSomebody get DARPA on this, stat.
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-213 days agoWouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew Edited forgotten word to make it clearer
Plus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
Imma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun.
See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
What about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
Somebody get DARPA on this, stat.
Wouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew
Edited forgotten word to make it clearer