jackalope@lemmy.mlM to Anti-Trust@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoGoogle is finally getting broken upwww.thebignewsletter.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down12
arrow-up113arrow-down1external-linkGoogle is finally getting broken upwww.thebignewsletter.comjackalope@lemmy.mlM to Anti-Trust@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarejackalope@lemmy.mlOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months ago My position is that I’m surprised by the rule of the law, as you can apparently both be a monopoly, and have (better) products in the same field, easily available, simply because people don’t care to learn alternatives Why does this surprise you?
minus-squareiii@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoI’m confused how something can be a monopolly, when there’s alternatives easlily available?
minus-squarejackalope@lemmy.mlOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 months agoMonopoly doesn’t refer to literally a single seller. It’s used to refer to disproportionate market power.
Why does this surprise you?
I’m confused how something can be a monopolly, when there’s alternatives easlily available?
Monopoly doesn’t refer to literally a single seller. It’s used to refer to disproportionate market power.