Hi, I’ve been thinking for a few days whether I should learn Docker or Podman. I know that Podman is more FOSS and I like it more in theory, but maybe it’s better to start with docker, for which there is a lot more tutorials. On the other hand, maybe it’s better to straight up learn podman when I don’t know any of the two and not having to change habits later. What do you think? For context, I know how containers works in theory, I know some linux I think well, but I never actually used docker nor podman. In another words: If I want to eventually end up with Podman, is it easier to start with docker and then learn Podman, or start with Podman right away? Thanks in advance

    • 1371113@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      OP, listen to this person. Docker will earn you cash. Podman is nicer to work with for your own shit.

    • CronyAkatsuki@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Docker and podman in general work the same, commands are the same, …

      Only biggest difference is that now that I’m trying to migrate from docker to podman is figting over volume binds permissions for databases and such.

      Finished migration of 3 containers, 50+ left.

  • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    At the end of the day, you’re running containers and both will get the job done. Go with whatever you want to start, and be open to try the other when you inevitably end up with jobby job that uses the other one instead.

  • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    As a podman user myself, they’re essentially the same. I look at the docker documentation when learning new things about podman. 99.9% of the time, it’s exactly the same. For the features that aren’t in podman, you can use the podman-docker package. This gets you a daemon so you can have some docker-specific features such as a container being able to start/stop other containers by mounting the socket as a volume, and it allows you to use docker-compose.

  • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Docker is more ubiquitous, Podman has use cases that diverge from Docker.

    Discover the use case and decide from there.

    That said docker is a good starting point, their documentation is pretty great and once you know docker you’ll better appreciate why podman is different.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s easier to start with docker first simply because of the sheer amount of learning resources available on the internet. If you’re having issues, you can usually find a solution quickly with a search engine.

    That’s being said, there’s not much differences on how to use them these days. You can even run docker compose on podman.

  • summerof69@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    You didn’t say what’s your goal. What do you want to achieve? For instance, if you work in IT you should probably learn Docker unless Podman is more relevant in your actual daily tasks.

    • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyiOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      My goal is selfhosting stuff mainly on my raspberry pi. I’m sure I’m not going to work in IT for 3 years and probably not for at least few years after that.

      • k_rol@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Then just go for Docker. Otherwise you may make it unnecessarily difficult for yourself and get discouraged. In a few years you may revisit the question and see if you still have an interest in podman.

  • Godnroc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    I tried out podman at first, but I found many docker instances simply provide a string of crap instead of explanations. It was easy to get a grasp of how docker worked, and now that I have an idea I feel like I could jump into podman better.

  • lal309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honestly, if you have never used containers before I would suggest starting with docker as it has more readily accessible beginner walk through and tutorials. From there, you will have a good idea as to switching to podman is the right move for you or not.

    Personally, I started with docker and haven’t moved from there since I don’t see a need (yet). I have dozens of services running on docker. I don’t know how heavy of a lift it would be to learn podman but like I said, I don’t feel the need to do so.

    Maybe try out both and see which one you like more?

    • somethingsomethingidk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just to offer the other perspective. I started with podman years ago. I knew very little about containers and I would say it made the learbing curve a lot steeper. Most guides and README’s use docker and when things didnt work I had to figure out if it was networking, selinux, rootless, not having the docker daemon, etc… without understanding fully what those things were because I didn’t know docker. But when I started running stuff on kubernetes, it was really easy. Pods in podman are isomorphic to kubernetes pods. I think the pain was worth it, but it was definitely not easy at the time. Documentation, guides, and networking have improved since then, so it may not be as big of a deal now

  • morhp@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’re pretty much the same. Use docker documentation for learning, but actually use podman, because it’s nicer to use (doesn’t require root, easier to install on many Linux distributions).

  • fart_pickle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Both. Start with docker as there’s a buttload of tutorials. Once you’re familiar with it jump to podman. Learn the differences, use both for a while and decide what suits you best.

  • shaked_coffee@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Still haven’t looked into podman properly, but docker is much easier to learn because as you said there’s a lot more material available online. I’d say start with Docker, and if in the future you will find out podman better fits your needs you can always switch (they should not be that different)

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Docker, there are more resources for it and once you know it Podman should be an easy migration if you want to. Also I’m not sure about your claim that Podman is more FOSS than docker, it’s “better” because it doesn’t run as root, but other than that I don’t know of any advantages to it that are not a derivation of “it runs as a regular user”.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also I’m not sure about your claim that Podman is more FOSS than docker

      The issue with Docker isn’t the core product itself, is the ecosystem, it’s the DockerHub, Kubernetes etc.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        So if someone made a non-foss frontend for Podman that would somehow make Podman less FOSS? Or of they started working with Podman? You don’t need to use any of those other products, and it’s not correct to say that docker is less FOSS because people have written proprietary software that uses it.

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I see your point and would usually think the same way / agree with it, however the issue with Docker is that you’re kind of forced and coerced into using those proprietary solutions around it. It also pushed people into a situation where it’s really hard to not depend on constant internet services to use it.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Most people self-hosting don’t need anything special, just a docker compose file. What proprietary software do you think is needed that’s not needed for Podman?

            • TCB13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Most people self-hosting don’t need anything special, just a docker compose file

              Yes, and they proceed to pull their software from DockerHub (closed and sometimes decides to delete things) and most of them lack the basic Linux knowledge to do it in any other way. This is a real problem.

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      On the same machine I have Docker running as root and not as root. I choose which version, root-ful/root-less depending on what the container needs to do.

      I think the only advantage is that Podman runs as root-less out of the box, where with Docker you have to do a few extra steps once it’s installed.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Podman is […] “better” because it doesn’t run as root, but other than that I don’t know of any advantages to it that are not a derivation of “it runs as a regular user”.

      Podman can run in rootless mode (with some caveats), but it is still able to run as root — it doesn’t only have the capability to run as a “regular user”.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Doesn’t really matter for basic stuff as it will be the same.

    Once you get into container orchestration the differences start and then you basically need to decide what you want to get out of it.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’re very similar so you pretty much can’t go wrong. Podman, I believe, is more secure by default (or aims to be) so might run into more roadblocks with its use.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      so might run into more roadblocks with its use.

      This has been my experience with Podman. That’s not to say that these roablocks aren’t without reason, nor merit, but there is always a trade off of convenience when optimizing for security.