D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago

Returning from vacation? The government can search your phone without a warrant.

arstechnica.com

external-link
message-square
47
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
  • privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
152
external-link

Returning from vacation? The government can search your phone without a warrant.

arstechnica.com

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago
message-square
47
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
  • privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Reminder: The "border exemption" to your rights is real.
  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    No. They already had him and the device, and he gave them the wipe pin when they asked him for the unlock pin. That’s destruction of evidence.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Destruction of what evidence? They didn’t have the phone unlocked. How do they even know anything was destroyed?

      They’ve got nothing and it’s going be dismissed.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        30 days ago

        Sure, you try that in court. See how it goes for you.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I doubt any court would agree with you.

        • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I looked it up and they cover the definition pretty well, that’s why i deleted the comment.

          https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2232

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

Privacy@lemmy.world

privacy@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.world

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.18K users / day
  • 1.43K users / week
  • 2.2K users / month
  • 7.83K users / 6 months
  • 13 local subscribers
  • 11K subscribers
  • 1.07K Posts
  • 10.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • iopq@lemmy.world
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.19
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org