Parents can protect their children and let me tell you clearly, all other ways to “protect” the children are here to create surveillance for adults across the whole internet. Don’t fall for it.
If a child is immediately presented with potentially incorrect/actively harmful information as fact from a “trusted source”, that’s a problem.
Should parents be teaching their child that the information can be wrong? Yes. But a lot of parents also take that information as gospel. Hell, I know lots of IT peeps who read off Google AI results as truth without giving it a second thought.
There’s also the fact that parents aren’t given the ability to opt their child out of the AI search results.
This also doesn’t appear to be an attempt to “won’t someone think of the children‽‽” but instead an objective look at the problems with an LLM being used in the way Google is.
Parents can protect their children and let me tell you clearly, all other ways to “protect” the children are here to create surveillance for adults across the whole internet. Don’t fall for it.
I mean, a broken clock is right twice a day.
If a child is immediately presented with potentially incorrect/actively harmful information as fact from a “trusted source”, that’s a problem.
Should parents be teaching their child that the information can be wrong? Yes. But a lot of parents also take that information as gospel. Hell, I know lots of IT peeps who read off Google AI results as truth without giving it a second thought.
There’s also the fact that parents aren’t given the ability to opt their child out of the AI search results.
This also doesn’t appear to be an attempt to “won’t someone think of the children‽‽” but instead an objective look at the problems with an LLM being used in the way Google is.