Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)X
Posts
0
Comments
94
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • The title sound bs

  • Les cônes oranges trahissent un peu l'endroit 😜

  • My guess is that the downvotes are for the NSFW tag

  • This thread sparkled a national debate

  • Special status seems to be an excuse to exclude first Nations from the rest of society, and get a good conscience about it.

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I'm not debating the legitimacy of the law, just the technical feasibility for big compagnies to do it

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • A fine is just a took to force compliance. The company hosted outside of the justification is free to ignore the fine, but they should not expect the government to facilitate their operations within their jurisdiction, and thus apply additional sanctions

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • A fine is one possible sanction, imposing local network infrastructure to not carry your traffic is another one that can be used as a leverage to get the fine or to force to compliance a company.

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yes they can, intelligence/network compagnies like spur even sell this service, but I give it to you that as an individual it may not be a trivial task.

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It's another debate, but countries do have the authority to enforce their laws on their sovereign scope, which include network infrastructure located in the country, used to transport traffic from foreign compagnies.

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • In case of GDPR, this is not true and compagnies are subject to this EU law if they process EU citizens' personal data. Wether they comply or can be prosecuted is another thing https://gdpr.eu/companies-outside-of-europe/

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Some countries already do (See fines from Russia to Google), but the compagnies don't have to operate in those countries and can choose to not serve traffic to IPs from that country.

  • Why would they ? It went so great last time !

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • While I understand the struggle, I would be careful not to taint the movement by aligning with money grabbers that don't really care about the fight, just their bottom line. Especially when it's 4Chan running to the feds 🤣

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • While I agree with you on the stupidity of the law, Americans company should not get away with not respecting local laws in country they do operate, like in the EU. An example is the fair usage law that is completely ignored by American company.

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • They say comply or get blocked, we know what is the next step

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • US law does not cover privacy like GDPR, however compagnies still have to comply with GDPR if they process EU data. Same logic apply here. Also 4chan running to cry to the feds is quite hilarious

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Actually they do if they serves traffic to the UK.

  • Yeah, the deep state propaganda against Bitcoin Cash, of course 🤣