Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)X
Posts
63
Comments
708
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • "Elemeno" reminds me of the decabet skit.

  • When you cant remember all of your many wives' names you label them like the seven dwarves.

  • Are those... magneto helmets?

  • There's even contours for his ears!

  • Inertia

  • A slime-cat?

  • Frequencies.

  • It's not safe to feel safe.

  • PIC

    Jump
  • The cow of judgement.

  • Well, I do have MBSE on the brain, but the idea here is more like a low-code/no-code environment with an ABSOLUTELY ENORMOUS "pit of success"... so large that even GenAI can reliably fall into it. Numbered tabs, you go left to right answering questions and fiddling with with prompts, paint-by-numbers for working software.

  • I imagine that it is theoretically possible to successfully vibe-code, but probably not with a conventional project layout nor would it look much like traditional programming. Something like your interaction primarily being a "requirements list", which gets translated into interfaces and heavy requirements tests against those interfaces, and each implementation file being disposable (regenerated) & super-self-contained, and only being able to "save" (or commit) implementations that pass the tests.

    ...and if you are building a webapp, it would not be able to touch the API layer except through operational transforms (which trigger new [major] version numbers]. Sorta like MCP.

    Said another way, if we could make it more like a "ratchet" incrementing, and less like an out-of-control aircraft.... then maybe?!?

  • "Spoiled Onions" sounds like a cool sublemmy name...

  • Unnaturally, obviously...

  • Yes. They all get several up-votes, this one included.

  • "Let's see how close I can get the lasers to my eyes without going blind..."

  • If you're up for some constructive criticism: I think the meme would be more effective if you put the silksong price in the lower panel to balance the $70 figure found in the top panel. Said another way, the lower text is missing the suffix "...for $20".

    ...and I guess while I'm at it, whatever that meme law is about fewer words is better makes me think the top panel could be trimmed down: The gaming industry explains why they need to charge $70 for a game in order to make a profit.

  • So even if it does not move, this pawn could get promoted by some future tile-slide... come to think of it, I guess two pawns could get promoted in the same turn via a tile-slide.