I know it's easy to believe there's some consistency there in the form of consistent hatred, but they actually aren't consistent in their hatred.
I agree with your premise philosophically: They demand that you must have every man trait, to be a man; and similarly for woman traits, to be a woman.
But, consider: only a tiny subset of people would ever be men or women in this formulation. If they believed this strictly and consistently, if they enforced it socially, they would be hopelessly outnumbered. Nobody would ever join the fascism club because nobody would be able to. They'd be wiped out quickly, too, because there would be very few opportunities to pass this ethos down to a following generation.
So in its application, they let all the rules go out the window, as long as you're saying you agree with them. Jewish person joining an anti-semitic hate group? You're on the team. Trans person calling for the end of trans healthcare? Welcome aboard. Latino group that opposes immigration? Come on in.
Fascism is about claiming you stand for one thing (which is, due to the nature of fascism, some kind of hate). But then actually taking in any person who is strategically useful to you as long as they don't rock the boat. The second there's a good reason to eject someone from the boat, they walk the plank. When it comes to gender, they'll accept any number of "disqualifying" characteristics--tall and broad-shouldered women, effeminate intellectual men, even literal trans people--as long as you're on board with hating the bad person of the week.
All right, I guess. He heard people calling Republicans weird and was like "Wait, don't forget how weird I am, too!" because he wants to make sure everyone knows he's still a Republican in his heart.
Well, someone who believes it was faked is crediting his side with that 13%. You're gonna trust the numbers of someone who thinks the moon landing was faked?
All I can think is it has to be a massive pain in the ass to do maintenance. You'd have to shut down the whole park and remove a bunch of unrelated slides to fix anything on one ride.
No matter what question you ask them, they have an answer. Even when you point out their answer was wrong, they just have a different answer. There's no concept of not knowing the answer, because they don't know anything in the first place.
They don't care. At the moment AI is cheap for them (because some other investor is paying for it). As long as they believe AI reduces their operating costs*, and as long as they're convinced every other company will follow suit, it doesn't matter if consumers like it less. Modern history is a long string of companies making things worse and selling them to us anyway because there's no alternatives. Because every competitor is doing it, too, except the ones that are prohibitively expensive.
There's been a lot of talk about how he's going senile or whatever.
The fact that we know he says the N word, but somehow he doesn't say it on mic, suggests to me that he still has his mental facilities. His filter still works. (The fact that he does filter himself should give you pause about what's actually inside his head.)
Podman is not yet ready for mainstream, in my experience
My experience varies wildly from yours, so please don't take this bit as gospel.
Have yet to find a container that doesn't work perfectly well in podman. The options may not be the same. Most issues I've found with running containers boil down to things that would be equally a problem in docker. A sample:
"rootless" containers are hard to configure. It can almost always be fixed with "--privileged" or some combination of permission flags. This would be equally true for docker; the only meaningful difference is podman tries to push everything into rootless. You don't have to.
network filesystems cause headaches, especially smbfs + sqlite app. I've had to use NFS or ext4 inside a network-mounted image for some apps. This problem is identical for docker.
container networking--for specific cases--needs to managed carefully. These cases are identical for docker.
And that's it. I generally run things once from the podman command line, then use podlet to create a quadlet out of that configuration, something you can't do with docker. If you are having any trouble with running containers under podman, try the --privileged shortcut, see that it works, and then double back if you think you really need rootless.
This is how I think about trans men. I'm a cis man, but I never liked men very much, I've just never thought of myself as anything else. A trans man--a person who would fight to be this gender? Reminds me that men have value too.
I haven't deployed Cloudflare but I've deployed Tailscale, which has many similarities to the CF tunnel.
Is the tunnel solution appropriate for Jellyfin?
I assume you're talking about speed/performance here. The overhead added by establishing the connection is mostly just once at the connection phase, and it's not much. In the case of Tailscale there's additional wireguard encryption overhead for active connections, but it remains fast enough for high-bandwidth video streams. (I download torrents over wireguard, and they download much faster than realtime.) Cloudflare's solution is only adding encryption in the form of TLS to their edge. Everything these days uses TLS, you don't have to sweat that performance-wise.
(You might want to sweat a little over the fact that cloudflare terminates TLS itself, meaning your data is transiting its network without encryption. Depending on your use case that might be okay.)
I suppose it’s OK for vaultwarden as there isnt much data being transfered?
Performance wise, vaultwarden won't care at all. But please note the above caveat about cloudflare and be sure you really want your vaultwarden TLS terminated by Cloudflare.
Would it be better to run nginx proxy manager for everything or can I run both of the solutions?
There's no conflict between the two technologies. A reverse proxy like nginx or caddy can run quite happily inside your network, fronting all of your homelab applications; this is how I do it, with caddy. Think of a reverse proxy as just a special website that branches out to every other website. With that model in mind, the tunnel is providing access to the reverse proxy, which is providing access to everything else on its own. This is what I'm doing with tailscale and caddy.
General recs
Consider tailscale? Especially if you're using vaultwarden from outside your home network. There are ways to set it up like cloudflare, but the usual way is to install tailscale on the devices you are going to use to access your network. Either way it's fully encrypted in transit through tailscale's network.
I like the one guy who's like "Hey, there it is."