Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
0
Comments
426
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • It's so painful for me to see there's a group of people who are ostensibly allies to the Palestinian cause, but who balk at the idea of them actually defending themselves against the apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide. The kind that will only support armed resistance after all is said and done, when it no longer matters. The kind that supports slave revolts in 19th century US, the warsaw uprising during WWII, the Black Panther party and Malcolm X in the 60s, the ANC during apartheid South Africa. But when a group uses violent means today to fight against horrific violence and oppression, that's a bridge too far and we all have to stop and think about the optics.

    They've tried non-violent means. We've all seen where that ends. Look up the march of return. Non-violent demonstration. Resulted in Israeli snipers targetting children, the disabled, and the elderly. The world looked on and did fucking nothing. And that's been the story over and over, for nearly a century. There's kids being murdered on a daily basis, but you want these Palestinians to sit on their thumbs and host a tea party. Go fuck yourself, they do not have time for this.

  • if we have more users, that improves the value and quality of the fediverse overall

    I don't consider this a given. E.g. your new users might all be dingleberries, or they might attract more bots. It also depends on your definition of quality. I quite like recognizing and conversing with regulars that I know from lemmy. This is something you lose with a larger userbase.

    Here's another way a high monthly active user count doesn't necessarily lead to a quality platform. Suppose most users post once a month. Conversations will largely be dominated by posts from folks who have no real connection with each other. Any meaningful conversation is drowned in an ocean of seagulls going "have my updoot, kind sir" and "this!". Higher user count, lower quality.

    Aside from that, vanity metrics like bare user count typically don't tell you whether you have a sustainable non-ad based platform. You don't need users, you need users willing to donate for the operation (to instance admins) and maintenance (to the devs) of the platform. And I feel (0 data to back this up) like users are more likely to be donating users if they feel like they know the operators and devs personally.

    I'm not saying the idea of getting more users is bad, I'm just saying its goodness is very far from established.

  • Have you done hazardous work? It fucks with your brain.

  • A true traitor of the people. Par for the course of Nobel peace prize winners. Kissinger won one, for example.

  • a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs.

    You mean this dictionary definition (Oxford)?

    Needs differ, hence compensation differs. The needs of one involved in hazardous work tend to be a bit higher than those involved in baking croissants.

  • So to convince me that candidate A would not do xyz, you keep harping on about candidate B and how they would do xyz. Do you understand why that's not a very convincing argument? We all know about project 2025, we all know about republicans. We're looking at it. That doesn't make democrats any better (on imperial foreign interventionist policies).

  • I don't know man, I see a pattern of every single democratic president since Eisenhower, no exceptions, enthusiastically committing war crimes, and you're trying to tell me "no, not this one, this one is different". Sounds like one of us is maybe a little bit in denial.

    Also, implying that it's a waste of time to look at the past actions of democrats to try and get a feel for what they will do in the future is such a self report.

  • I would like to start out by saying I would've preferred Harris over Trump, and that the two parties are NOT the same. For example, the FTC as it was during Biden would never have happened under a republican administration.

    What makes you think that bombing Venezuela wouldn't have happened under Harris? I can only think of three explanations: because she is a woman, because she is a democrat, or because Kamala Harris specifically is against foreign intervention.

    I would like to take this moment to reiterate that I would've preferred Harris over Trump, and that the two parties are NOT the same.

    The first explanation sounds weirdly sexist to me, so I won't spend too much time on it. We don't have a female US president to compare with, but look at the voting record in congress and the senate on the use of force in the invasion of Iraq back in 2002. When you control for party affiliation, women were actually more likely than men to vote in favor of the invasion.

    I would like to take this moment to reiterate that I would've preferred Harris over Trump, and that the two parties are NOT the same.

    Maybe because she's a democrat then? Let's look at some recent democratic presidents, and see how they fared on foreign interventions.

    Obama: 40 billion in military aid to Israel, expanded drone campaigns in Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan. Surge of 30k troops to Afghanistan. Continued use of black sites and torture camps like Gitmo. Explicit legal protection for the torturers.

    Biden: 18B in military aid to Israel as it was committing a genocide. Air strikes on Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan.

    I would like to take this moment to reiterate that I would've preferred Harris over Trump, and that the two parties are NOT the same.

    Maybe Harris is an especially anti foreign intervention person then. From her DNC speech I quote: "I will ensure America has the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world." What do you reckon she wanted that fighting force for? A tea party?

    I would've preferred Harris over Trump. It would've mattered a great deal for women's rights, lgbt rights, and to some small extent even a bit for worker's rights. But to pretend the electorate has any meaningful choice when it comes to US imperialism, is, I think, not realistic.

  • Facts don't care about your feelings. You've presented zero evidence to the contrary, how are you this confident about your assertion? This is such a joke

  • And still there's politicians out there saying things like "I will not ban fracking. I did not as vice president. In fact, I cast the tie-breaking vote to open up more fracking leases". Playing with people's lives just to make a buck. Really shows they're not beholden to the people but to the owning class.

  • I've looked at these, and here's a blog post carefully going over the points made, meticulously refuting them one by one.

  • Oh hey look a guy on the internet who doesn't when someone contradicts his baseless claims with evidence. There's something you don't see every day.

  • The "drive off the cliff" party vs the "drive off the cliff, but ever so slightly slower and also we'll wave some rainbow flags I guess" party. I know who I'm voting for!

  • What about the nakba massacres strikes you as reversible? Do you know what the word reversible means?

  • That's verifiably nonsense. I don't know how you feel about holocaust deniers, but that's what you are to me right now. And to many others. There's no room in society for you, as far as I'm concerned.

  • If I set fire to your house, and then I turn to you saying "ooh boy this is a hairy problem, you better take care of it", I am entirely responsible for your house being on fire.

  • It should be noted that it was the "please stop murdering children" kind of "antisemitism", not real antisemitism.

  • I'm with you on this one. What could they do but hvae their snipers target the elderly, children, and disabled? And they were being humane too! They were aiming specifically for the knees so rhat they wouldn't be killed, but just completely disabled for the rest of their lives. Honestly confused as to why Israeli leadership wasn't nominated for a Nobel peace price for that one.

  • And what do you personally think of this strategy?