Q: What career would you like to pursue?
A: art or music
Q: are you ok with ..(see post)
A: no
What this tells the student is that you may want to reconsider your path if you're not cool with a bit of uncertainty.
If the person was cool with those stakes for the sake of their passion, then fuckin right on dude
If you present the decision tree with a series of Boolean options, a correct or incorrect approach makes sense. Again, this shit was a thing back in the 90s and it was all about guiding kids by showing them a gentle reality of choices. Not dystopian at all.
I mean, or it could be one of those high school aptitude tests where they try to figure out how to guide you in your future career. If someone picked an unstable career, it makes sense to follow up with the realities of it.
Idk about you guys, but they did this shit with me and my classmates back in the 90s and early aughts.
It's an out of context image that has no other presence on the web aside from the memes, so it's likely just rage bait bullshit.
Based on your response, I'm guessing you didn't read about the history of the phrase that I linked, which explains what it meant and how it was used in the early, mid, and late 20th century. As well as the 21st century.
Just because you think something means something doesn't mean it's true.
The word's always been pretty straightforward. I've never seen it mean anything performative. It's always just a soft and empathetic person to a harmful degree.
I don't think "blame" is the right word here. They're/we're looking for reasons for how things ended up the way they did.
IMO it's unhelpful at best and harmful at worst to look at the data and the people analyzing it and approach it as a blame thing - or even to assume it's a finger pointing game. The facts are that the voting strategies of certain groups of people changed this election. The important thing moving forward is to understand who changed and why they changed, because then those things can be addressed.
And yeah, DNC leadership is either dumb or actively malicious because they keep pushing failed ideas under a false banner.
That's not what those terms mean or why they are used as insults.
And, generally speaking, a few ethnic/gender groups changed their voting strategies this election, while others didn't. The articles calling out different demographics are pointing out reality. Those shifts affected the results of the election.
That's why they are being pointed out, instead of pointing out that one group did exactly what was expected of them and what they did last time, and the time before, and the time before...
So I'd challenge you that it's not recriminations or gross, it's simply pointing out what changed and how it led to us being in our current spot. You can't fix things/change course without understanding where you are.
So then it's not worse?