Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
1
Comments
989
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yea, they only get scanned at certain points, so youll have no idea where it is when its between them. Long distance like this and usually customs is when your packages disappear.

  • That rage bait is mainly because Valve added Steam Points, so people say dumb shit to bait awards. They should remove Steam awards giving points to other people, I don't why they ever thought that was a good idea.

  • No

  • Ignoring all the problems, sure. You could get through it, but there were lots of bugs and inconsistencies. I played again recently after all the patches and while it was much better, it still had it's fair share of issues. The overall game, lore and story is very good, though I think DOS combat is far superior for a video game than DnD.

  • Great responses from the dev. Steam moderation really needs an overhaul, whichever moderators or automated systems that are in place really don't do a good job. There's a lot of hate in reviews and Steam discussions that should just lead to people's accounts being permanently muted across the platform and preferably in games too where possible.

  • Nah, Larian will jump the gun, release too early and have another bug infested game. They need to reduce their scope, actually take their time and make a great RPG. BG3 was too much for them, a smaller more refined experience would have been amazing, they shouldn't chase "bigger is better".

  • Not exactly no, they are directly involved in the process. They pick which outlets can vote, so you immediately have conflict of interest.

    As a fair awards show, its fucking awful, but as we know, thats just the facade to selling people new products. It's just advertising, hyped up.

    Also media publications are often biased anyway as their entire business relies on exposure, which is infinitely harder to get if you are critical of games. Nobody is gonna slap a 5/10 on their product.

    Not to mention its always games with money behind them, there's lots of actual quality games released that never get a mention, let alone a nomination, because they simply werent published by a big company. They have fucking DLC nominated instead of games if the big guys didnt release anything that year.

  • The awards are done by the big studios anyway, Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, EA, Ubisoft etc, thats the jury, it always has a bias. Anything else only wins something if its so popular that it has to. It's just a AAA circle jerk mostly.

    But its not about the awards anyway, its about advertising.

  • It's just a big advertising show yeah. Like E3 but with all the soul and community sucked out of it. I dont know why anyone cares.

  • There's some great potential malicious compliance to be had here.

    Although the best compliance is to just avoid ever going to the USA.

  • Less, but still dumb and crazy enough that fascism is allowed to get a foothold again.

  • Not your fault. Both are valid abbreviations for each other. Only E.U. would actually be concrete, but...

    Saying the EU should be the European Union. Whereas just EU should signify Europe as you wouldnt say the Europe.

    The context here made it obvious you meant Europe though, dont know how people missed that.

  • Depends what generation you ask, because a lot of the CoD audience now, never even played Black Ops 2. Which I agree, was the last good game, I'll give credit to BO3 for it's amazing zombies experience, with mod tools on PC, which was a surprise.

  • Problem is, Treyarch were the only competent studio after all of IW left. So they have been constantly called in to help to clean up the mess the other studios keep making.

    Now development on the games is split across Activision studios all over the world, so the chance of there ever being a coherent self contained experience again is basically zero. Their scope got too big and they couldnt find the right people to take it on.

  • Back to back releases isnt the problem.

    Remember the "Call of Duty games are DLC" jokes? Well that is literally what they have become. There's no soul in them anymore. They are just a vessel to sell skins.

  • Hardware doesnt need to get more powerful either. If we actually harnessed it, we have what we need already.

  • Why spend time making better software when the end user can just buy better hardware!