I'm actually thinking of people who have neither sets, working or not, but you've got me thinking: if a non-functional set would still count in the case of it being the only one (I.e. someone infertile but otherwise nothing out of the ordinary) I'm not sure why it wouldn't when it's beside a working one. If it's binary, surely they either count or they don't?
males and females are defined universally by the type of gamete they have the biological function to produce—not by karyotypes, secondary sexual characteristics, or other correlates
That's not typically the definition people use, but I do admit it's a way of "solving" the issues of a binary that often arise when using the more common definitions. You're either a sperm-maker or egg-maker.
So using this definition, there are likely still some intersex people or at the very least people who have an "undefined" sex.
Is sorting by date taken a feature in KDE? If so, I might change to that from Cinnamon (the default that Mint installed with). I'm talking organizing the files based on the exif data, not modification date or the like.
It's a feature in Windows that I didn't realize how useful it was until I didn't have it and searching online for how to do it in Linux always comes back with some crazy-seeming solutions.
Yeah, I needed to scour forums and use the terminal to make the num lock be on by default on startup for entering my password. And to get a game working. And to get the system to ask which drive to boot from (installed Mint on a separate hard drive instead of a partition). Still haven't figured out how to sort pictures in a folder by date taken, but I'm gonna take a wild guess that'll need the terminal...
Yes, but is a chicken egg one that's laid by a chicken, or one that hatches the chicken? The answer to that question affects the answer to which came first
Fair enough. So somebody with no plumbing at all would just be undefined in terms of sex then?