Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)U

unwarlikeExtortion

@ unwarlikeExtortion @lemmy.ml

Posts
0
Comments
278
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Because historically (and for the most part today as well), it costs money.

    Sure, today stuff like ChatGPT and the somewhat older Google Translate exists, but that doesn't solve the cost issue. (And I'm skirting on the huge elephant in the room called quality for a bit of brevity).

    There's a huge chance someone paid a good chunk of money for all the books you find dirt-cheap at a flea market, check out at a library or happen to find in your own house.

    Printing physical books is expensive. Publishers also want a margin, and a lot of authors want royalties.

    In the end even if the publisher and author are both good souls demanding nothing, someone needs to foot the cost of printing. But before that, you'd need to go through non-trivial talks with most authors' publishers and/or authors themselves.

    Then you need to arange for translation, typesetting and printing if you're not doing it yourself. That takes both time and money.

    And if you were to do all that yourself, it'd be a huge time investment, with a potential lawsuit if you don't do those damn talks. So most just don't bother.

    Businesses are incredibly inefficient, even though some are "successful" and have a lot of cash to burn. They need to pay workers, bills, buy and fix equipment, and of course, a cut needs to go to the top people. Usually the "golden" 80-20 rule applies to almost everything: 20% of books make 80% of money, 20% of employees make 80% of money, and a different 20% of people do 80% of the work, etc. And of course, in this world, it's all about the money.

    A translation is usually initiated by a publisher that has a manager who wants to get his section's metrics up to go cry to his own manager about how good he is to get a raise or not get fired. This is a daily grind. Sometimes (but quite rarely), that leads the manager to the decision of publishing a new book. Usually such actions are guided by things like bestseller lists, reviews and personal biases of the manager and the company as a whole. Sometimes the publisher hires an agency to try to approximate the demand for such a book (even more money spent). Then they do the talks. This also costs money, and the result is also a cost of money (the royalties to be paid). Then comes translation, then printing, then distribution to bookstores, and finally advertising.

    These are just the steps that come to mind. All cost money, and all the books you see for sale in a bookstore went through all of these steps. For a library, not as much (but still the vast majority) did.

    Sure, not every situation is the same, so there are companies that specialize in providing translations of well-known works or companies whose manager at one point said they need to publish 25 translations yearly (instead of one individual one), so they kind of "flood" the market.

    But sometimes it's just the whim of a newspaper whose management thought printing classic works of shorter length and bundling them with their newspaper would drive up newspaper sales.

    It's incredible how each document (edition of a book or otherwise) has multiple stories (of the author, publisher, translator, seller, advertiser, buyer, worker in logistics/delivery driver,...) that shaped the life of it. Some lasted a few hours, and some took hundereds of man-hours. All of this somehow translates to money.

    That's the long answer.

    The short one is: 80% the economy and 20% human laziness.

  • My main gripe with this travesty of a "Start menu" is that it isn't the Tom Hanks movie of a similar name.

    The other is that even if it were, it won't just play, but rather send you to the shiniest new subscription service to subscribe.

  • It's a both-ways situation.

    They allow only the Fisher-Price version of phones so less-than-power-users don't do something stupid.

    They also allow only Fisher-Price so power users can't beat Celebrite as easily.

  • It isn't misleading (that'd be a technically true headline, which this isn't). This is a downright lie, or as some might say, "fake news".

  • Unlawful detention, obstruction of justice, overstepping bounds,...

    Wait, qualified immunity.

    What a joke.

  • Nor does it "read" its input. It doesn't even process it.

    It's built/tuned using it. Or as AI techros would say, trained.

  • This.

    Regardless of the up and downsides respectively, it should be the penis owner himself to decide.

  • But a "backdoor" which is swung wide open if you don't secure it isn't really a backdoor. It's more akin to an open window.

  • You need to have a good hairdresser. Or multiple if you want your "problem" under wraps.

  • DRM creates artificial scarcity

    But does it?

    That being said, the cause of the profit-boostig effect is the walled garden effect, not artificial scarcity.

    Whether amazon sells DRM-free ebooks on their Kindles or not isn't the point. The point is the ease of use.

    Most people will just stick with Amazon - even if they can migrate "legally". People don't like change. Of course, some always will.

    If it gets expensive, the share of those jump-shippers increases - would you rather pay 25% less for your books if you switch to a competitors. Migrating your (hypothetical) DRM-free library is a bit of a process, but something most anyone could do.

    ^ This is what they're aftaid of. People being able to jump ship. Corporate not being in complete control. Customers not being fully dependant on their overlord.

    This is why DRM is a thing. This is why EULAs state "you own a single, non-transferrable, by us voidable at any time, free (for now) licence to use this software". This is why most privacy policies ask way too many things.

    It's pure greed. Why should I, as a bookseller, make it possible for you to hypothetically switch to someone else when I can do the exact opposite? Why should I not download all your contacts, just in case I need them? Why should I not use your IP/region for "tailored" pricing?

    Scarcity has nothing to do with it. There are ways of obtaining books online. DRM-free or not. Free or not. If consumers were so efficient in their consuming, Amazon's book business would either sell books for pennies to today's price in dollars, or they'd shut it down for their more profitable ventures.

    What they need as sick and greedy bastards is control.

  • Wearing a pink blouse and skirt, complete with rainbow-colored nails.

  • One is too little.

    Our Glorious Leader needs at least three.

    Ideally, he'd retroactively get one for each year after his International Debut in Cinema (Home Alone 2)!

  • Yes.

    Me and my buddies. And a lot of wilderness.

  • There's nothing that screams "pussy" quite as much as toxic masculinity.

    Guns, flags and monster trucks are almost infallible giveaways.

  • They should change their name to Antitethical then.

  • What's weird to me is the choice of the 3-letter code instead of the 2-letter one. (The one almost always used). Especially when "UK" is 2-letter.

  • Tbh it's wrong.

    Israel and Palestine aren't one person.

    The Palestine person attacking was probably paid by Israel to do so.

    Israel killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, not one person.

    Even though the video is not trying to be Israeli propaganda, it still gives Israel more leeway than it should.

    I know I'm focusing on technicalities, but that's the thing with genocides: whatever you do, they always get whitewashed. Even if you don't want them to.

  • The best way to send those thugs home is for the crowd to act like a bunch of drill instructors screaming at them how fat and worthless they are.

  • To me, the peak in "peak 18-year-old" to me sounds like the Urban dictionary definition of peak than anything else.

    We're @ peak 18 yo rn & its LIT AF🔥