Most put it on port 80 with the perfectly valid assumption that the user is sticking a reverse proxy in front of it. Container should expose 80 not port forward 80.
As someone used to the bad old days, gimmie containers. Yes it kinda sucks but it sucks less than the alternative. Can you imagine trying to get multiple versions of postgres working for different applications you want to host on the same server? I also love being able to just use the host OS stock packages without needing to constantly compile and install custom things to make x or y work.
I consider any food with entirely vegan listed ingredients as vegan. If there is milk or meat in the ingredients then the responsibility lies with me.
If it was processed using bone meal, or fertilized with animal products etc without my knowledge, the ethical responsibility for that falls on the producer not the consumer. It is possible for them to make it without.
Wow I enjoyed this one back in the day. It advertised itself as self contained fantasy novel, no prequels sequels or junk, which was mostly what sold me on picking it up.
These are not "safety" glasses for the benefit of the user, where they are the ones in control of the data. This is all for the benefit of the corporation.
These glasses do not have even a fraction of the computing power to do any of that on device. It's a uploading everything to the cloud. The design is surveilance first ask questions later.
They don't care about making profit by selling a product or a service, it's all a speculative bet. They think if they "simply" make AGI they will win all the economy forever, and that there is no second place.
Everyone can see it coming, but they believe the AI companies' hype that the AGI breakthrough will be here "soon". Which if actually true, might be worth the bet.
For my money they either hit AGI and then we all die, or there is a crash before that. Yay.
It's only pervasive because the AI companies are losing money on every generated token while burning investor money to keep the lights on. If people had to pay for what it really costs they'd be using it a lot less.
And even if they solve some problems with AI and make them smarter, they still have to solve the "actually making a profit" problem to justify these share prices. LLMs already have some use at their current level, but certainly not for the price they'd need to charge to break even, let alone actually making a profit. If they double the smarts but double the training and/or inference cost, they'll still end up in the same place.
As I already said, it's impossible to time it and you'd be an idiot to try. There could be three more years of bubble first in which case shorting on margin would be ruinous. “Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you and I can remain solvent” yada yada.
I have similar concerns, comparing gdp to valuation seems nonsensical. But at the same time the valuation is still ludicrous. Nvidia designs chips, TSMC makes them, datacenters buy them, datacenters sell the compute to AI vendors like openai who sell services to customers for a price that doesn't cover even a fraction their costs, let alone being profitable.
In my book, either two things will happen. Before the money runs out, the AI companies will hit their stated goal of AGI, but without doing any of the safety work, and then everybody dies. The money running out and GFC 2.0 is the "good" ending. If I was even remotely confident in my ability to guess the timing of how it would all play out I'd be shorting up to my eyeballs.
AMD and Nvidia put hacks and workarounds in their windows drivers for individual games, to make those specific games run better. Usually only for the big AAA releases. They won't be doing that anymore for the "old" cards.
It's basically like https://thetvdb.com/ & https://www.themoviedb.org/ with buttons to auto download the media and automations on the backend to make that all happen.