I'm aware, but I myself have < 3TB and if I actually need it I'll be more happy to pay. It's my "backup of last resort", I keep other backups on site and infrequently on a portable HDD offsite.
I use aws s3 deep archive storage class, $0.001 per GB per month. But your upload bandwidth really matters in this case, I only have a subset of the most important things backed up this way otherwise it would take months just to upload a single backup. Using rclone sync instead of just uploading the whole thing each time helps but you still have to get that first upload done somehow...
I have complicated system where:
borgmatic backups happen daily, locally
those backups are stored on a btrfs subvolume
a python script will make a read-only snapshot of that volume once a week
the snapshot is synced to s3 using rclone with --checksum --no-update-modtime
once the upload is complete the btrfs snapshot is deleted
I've also set up encryption in rclone so that all the data is encrypted an unreadable by aws.
Star Trek has always been a show using sci-fi elements to draw parallels to our own culture. What mirror do you feel Jay-Den holds up to people in the real world?
Most put it on port 80 with the perfectly valid assumption that the user is sticking a reverse proxy in front of it. Container should expose 80 not port forward 80.
As someone used to the bad old days, gimmie containers. Yes it kinda sucks but it sucks less than the alternative. Can you imagine trying to get multiple versions of postgres working for different applications you want to host on the same server? I also love being able to just use the host OS stock packages without needing to constantly compile and install custom things to make x or y work.
I consider any food with entirely vegan listed ingredients as vegan. If there is milk or meat in the ingredients then the responsibility lies with me.
If it was processed using bone meal, or fertilized with animal products etc without my knowledge, the ethical responsibility for that falls on the producer not the consumer. It is possible for them to make it without.
Wow I enjoyed this one back in the day. It advertised itself as self contained fantasy novel, no prequels sequels or junk, which was mostly what sold me on picking it up.
These are not "safety" glasses for the benefit of the user, where they are the ones in control of the data. This is all for the benefit of the corporation.
These glasses do not have even a fraction of the computing power to do any of that on device. It's a uploading everything to the cloud. The design is surveilance first ask questions later.
They don't care about making profit by selling a product or a service, it's all a speculative bet. They think if they "simply" make AGI they will win all the economy forever, and that there is no second place.
Every additional customer using their product currently causes them to lose money, hand over fist.
You should still boycott them anyway though, they care about user numbers and user activity.