I will say, starting with a conclusion/theory is fine, but the next step is to do everything you can to disprove it. The more you and other fail, the stronger it becomes
I've had a mostly good experience with pop. It's definitely a different workflow than I was used to, but it works for me. Looking at switching to nobra though.
When life gives you gators, don't make Gatorade. Make life take the gators back! Get mad! I don't want your damn gators! What am I supposed to do with these?! Demand to see life's manager! Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson gators! Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's gonna burn your house down! With the gators! I'm gonna get my engineers to invent a combustible gator that burns your house down!
Wasn't there a book or short story about a society that "equalized" people by dragging them down to the lowest level, like strong people had to carry weights around, smart people would get like a brain chip thing that scrambles there thoughts etc.
"We are not increasing the price of your subscription, we are simply changing the benifits you have and adding a tier above yours that's identical to what you used to have" was basically whe announcement they made alongside that IIRC
Let's say, for the sake of argument, being gay is a sin. Isn't one of Jesus' more well known lessons "let he who has never sinned throw the first stone" or something like that? Like his main thing is forgiving people and providing unconditional love. I'd say focusing on someone's perceived sin is straight up non-Christian
"Here's a note that I promise they left"