I suspect that they reproduce quickly, since it is a species of algae. I don't know much about this topic though.
- Posts
- 2
- Comments
- 96
- Joined
- 1 yr. ago
- Posts
- 2
- Comments
- 96
- Joined
- 1 yr. ago
It seems that what was available at https://dubvee.org/post/3788765 is available at https://kbin.earth/m/announcements@dubvee.org/t/1605451/Shutting-Down-on-July-31-This-fediverse-experiment-was-a still.
I don't think that anyone should be "humiliated". If someone expresses an idea, it's likely that they are making use of that idea in their life (or that a reader might start using that idea in their life), so if you think their idea is harmful, it's surely better to provide an alternative idea rather than only question their dignity. Expressing that someone should "come back when they are better educated" makes me think that you want people to stop making comments as frequently and to read comments more often than they did before. I think that reading more comments can be helpful, but suggesting that someone should avoid commenting deprives us of an opportunity to understand that person better, and if we want to cooperate with someone, it would be better to have a better understanding of them (and if we don't cooperate with someone, we will probably have to compete with them: "When goods don't cross borders, soldiers will"). The only reason I know of to stop engaging with someone is if they're acting in bad faith: if someone is trying to distract you by trying to get you to make uninteresting comments instead of allowing your attention to be focused on something more productive, it'd be a help to other people to make that clear. In essence, this is "trolling". Something like Bluesky lists might be useful in that situation. I don't see how targeting someone to "dump on" is helpful: that seems like a distraction from more productive activities, which is probably exactly what a "troll" wants. I suspect that the best "consequence" in response to harm is to start ignoring someone and to make it easier for other people to ignore that person.
I haven't had any notably negative experiences while using the Fediverse. Even in cases when someone makes an "aggressive" reply to a comment of mine, if I ask a follow-up question, most people respond genuinely, so I often end up having a productive and enjoyable conversation. The situation is probably different when someone is really mad at you: if someone makes dozens of accounts to spam messages and downvotes, that would be really annoying and would make it more difficult to use the Fediverse productively, and I've seen reports of that happening to several people (and that might be what happened to the maintainer of Tesseract). Handling that situation would probably be harder to deal with than while using a centralized service since someone could use various servers to target one person, so there might not be one person who can handle all the spam. Reddit probably has a system to automatically block ingenuine downvotes and spam messages (especially if a particular person is receiving a lot of them), but I'm not sure that the Fediverse has an automatic system to achieve the same results, so it might be down to an administrator or a group of administrators to manually detect disruptive accounts/users. In consideration of how a typical person would view typical Fediverse comments, they would probably be put off by how they are probably more political and violent in nature when compared to those from other services. I've seen several comments that quite explicitly expressed "rich people should be killed", and I've seen that at least one was removed by a moderator/administrator. Such comments surely do more harm than good: most people surely prefer to talk to people who aren't calling for violence and are generally civil. To help with this, it's probably good to report comments that are outright violent or that would be of interest to an administrator and to downvote "aggressive" comments so that people are more likely to be able to peruse comments without having a bad experience. In general, it's surely a good thing to provide comments that engage with a post/comment in good faith so that people have something/someone that they can enjoy interacting with, but I don't often have a thought that is coherent enough to be worth sharing, so I don't expect this to happen very often.
I believe that it's unlikely that many people outside of Afghanistan will ever meet an Afghan that isn't a Muslim.
Almost the entire Afghan population is Muslim, with less than 1% being non-Muslim.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Afghanistan#Religion
I wanted to know whether this is a SemVer version, and it seems that it is: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/tag/v12.0.0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Base_(hate_group)
The organization's founder was a former employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Pentagon. Nazzaro, who used to work for the FBI and the Pentagon, moved to Russia around the time he created The Base, and directs the group's activities from there. In November 2020, a feature-length interview with Nazzaro was broadcast on Russian state television. In April 2025, The Base solicited volunteers and offered financial rewards for attacks on power plants, military and police vehicles and government buildings in Ukraine, as well as for the assassination of Ukrainian military, police and political figures.
Dorsey's new open source messaging app, Bitchat Bluetooth-based
Does that already exist? https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/#briar I'm not sure how "decentralized" it is, but it is probably at least somewhat decentralized.
I didn't know about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_the_Author before I added this comment.
Writers need to be interpreted, because it's unlikely that they actually understand what they wrote. Therefore, when employing a novel to address a problem, my interpretation is probably more important than the original work.
It's not even clear that Bram Stoker had a good understanding of the word "Dracula": https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2467&v=BvFwqVzEsfw
I believe that a vampire is a representation of exploitative forces that you invite into your own life but could avoid if you chose to. A policeman is hard to avoid, especially if they have a warrant. Therefore, a vampire cannot be a policeman in the first place, since the state of being a policeman overwhelms the state of being a vampire.
The face reminded me of the style of the face pictures for Psycho Patrol R. I doubt that any one picture is exactly the same, but the style is similar enough to remind me. https://shared.fastly.steamstatic.com/store_item_assets/steam/apps/1907590/ss_97de425d644d8a91b36a76e87a82ad9b647c95bc.600x338.jpg https://store.steampowered.com/app/1907590/Psycho_Patrol_R/
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/pro-palestine-socialist-zohran-mamdani-wins-nyc-mayor-primary Published date: 25 June 2025 10:37 BST
I don't think criminal law can be useful without punishment.
In criminal law, a sentence forms the final explicit act of a judge-ruled process, and also the symbolic principal act connected to his function. In criminal law, a sentence is the punishment for a crime ordered by a trial court
I did find https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_law#Objectives_of_criminal_law interesting.

This stuck out to me, and I didn't see it from this post or a comment:
This was also interesting: