Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

thinkercharmercoderfarmer

@ thinkercharmercoderfarmer @slrpnk.net

帖子
3
评论
69
加入于
3 mo. ago

  • Grew up poor, didn't know it. Lots of Mac 'n Cheese w/ hotdogs and canned vegetables. I remember the first time I had a fresh green bean, I was put off by the texture. Wasn't used to vegetables with structure.

    Edit: also a fair amount of Hamburger Helper in my childhood. It's OK.

  • Pasta and seasoning. And cheese I guess. Intended to me mixed with ground beef in order to stretch it into more meals. It's not awful, just poor people food.

  • For the unedited version check out my Patreon

  • My only regret is that I can't really do hands or any other body parts.

  • Here to answer the call. my first ever yuri

  • 已被移除

    Perfectly Balanced

    跳过
  • the garden variety eugenicist shitheel kind. I always hope it's just an edgy kid who got on the wrong forums and craves the attention, but they're also doing pro-russia FUD, so there's a small but depressingly real chance that this is their job.

  • I had thought I had seen both as well.

  • Are you inviting me to a money fight? I do love those. Let's both put in ludicrous bids on some AI company and fight over ownership to pump it's value in the market, I haven't done one of those in months. Winner buys the next yacht we sink in the Bermuda Triangle to appease the Elder Ones, Respect upon their Unknowable Names. If only the poor knew how hard we worked to prevent this puny planet from being eaten by elder demons, they would be grateful.

  • Wow, I haven't seen that comic in years; the first time I saw it I was in a pretty bad mental space and I think this perspective helped more than I realized at the time. Thanks for the memory ❤️

  • Question: would I have to give up my exploitative companies that fuel my bid to become the first King of Internet? Because that's kind of a dealbreaker for me.

  • Skipped over the opening graphic on first read but just read it. Could they have picked a creepier sample sentence.

  • As long as I hang onto it I can convince myself that I might pick it back up at some point. To give it away is to admit defeat.

  • LMAO I came in to the comments to ask "why are you even on social media then?" and I did not expect the answer to be "to advocate for eugenics"

  • People often respond to me this way, assuming naivete. That if I come to fully understand the depths of suffering well enough the blinders will fall away and I will understand, finally, that cruelty is the only just response to cruelty. I have seen enough of the depravity of humanity firsthand to understand the feeling of helpless rage, and I know firsthand how just it feels to give payback in kind. But I don't think setting the bar of acceptable behavior to whoever does the worst thing is a wise solution. And I think if you see evil and your response is to match it with like, you must then consider yourself evil. I don't want to be evil even if it feels just in the moment. I've tried it and it feels shitty. I like my way better.

  • What I mean is, it's not less bad because it's not two distinct phenomena. Whether or not someone is guilty of a heinous crime has nothing to do with whether or not they're entitled to some basic human rights. Human rights are not treats that are allocated by an authority for good behavior and revoked if you do something naughty. If you contend that everyone has certain rights, as I do, they have to be universal and irrevocable, no matter what.

    The reason they have to be irrevocable is because once you concede that they may be revoked, you now have the problem of who has the power to revoke them. You can either decide to revoke them yourself (vigilantism) or grant that power to someone else (authoritarianism). And while I am no expert in history, I feel confident in my belief that granting this authority to anyone is a recipe for disaster. The only other option, then, is to assert that even the worst possible person must still be afforded basic human rights, no matter what, and go from there. Anything less than that and you're sliding down the slippery slope toward dictatorship.

  • I don't think it's useful to classify people into good and evil. I think the exercise of power is a vice and some people get addicted to it. Causing other people to suffer (and getting away with it) is an exercise of power, and it's one of the most accessible ones, because there's always someone you can hurt if you look around. Children, homeless people, criminals, or anyone else deemed unworthy of protection by the more powerful. I reckon some people may be more susceptible to it the same way some people are more susceptible to alcohol addiction, but it's complicated and there's a lot I don't know about how abuse of power compares to abuse of alcohol. But classifying them as evil is a thought terminating cliche: they do bad things because they're bad people, simple as that. I think thinking about other people that way lets us self-justify a lot of horrific shit in the name of punishing bad people.

  • First line of the pitch for n8n lol:

    Build with the precision of code or the speed of drag-n-drop.

    At least they're upfront about the tradeoffs

  • You baryodorks just can't take the L can you.