Wolff suggesting that Epstein blackmail Trump for political favor. That's the part which will allow Trump to shrug this off like everything else. He will say Wolff (and the Democrats) were trying to blackmail him. Since the libs welcomed Wolff to the resistance in 2018, it'll be easy.
We have great ammo but now it's tainted because libs can't help but to praise and welcome any corrupt fucker that criticizes Trump, making the criticisms look weak.
I don't think you can make these decisions without having to build it. You won't know if you need a three-way framework until you get to the point where you're building that framework. By then you might learn something new and have a better idea or find a reason why it wouldn't work. Something can sound really good in theory and have no problems but then problems somehow appear in practice. I encourage anyone to get some friends and try to carry out a big project together. You'll start to see why it's not as easy as finding the right answer on paper first. It's not really an ideas problem, it's an organization problem. It's getting people together, synchronized, and focused on one goal despite the hiccups that will appear. It's also being able to keep those people together and focused when things go wrong and you have to change the plan.
It can't all be on the unlearned though. If people are more stubborn and less enthused to learn then that means the teachers and thought-leaders have screwed up somewhere along the line as well.
I'm actually wondering if people treating theory as parables is a problem. It tends to gloss over the specific context in which events happen in favor of crafting a tidy and appealing (biased) narrative. If you're trying to use theory that way, and you want people to get a certain message, you will bend the theory to fit that message. You will ignore the things that don't support your analysis in favor of things that do.
The October Revolution, also known as the Great October Socialist Revolution (in Soviet historiography), or Bolshevik revolution, was the second of two revolutions in Russia in 1917. It was led by Vladimir Lenin's Bolsheviks as part of the broader Russian Revolution of 1917–1923. It began through an insurrection in Petrograd (now Saint Petersburg) on 7 November 1917 [O.S. 25 October].
They should do that but make it really infuriating by not including any US or UK soldiers whatsoever. Don't even mention them. Have it be a small group of Nazi soldiers trying to take territory in the USSR. They have captured a Soviet soldier to use for information. Predator attacks. Slowly kills the Nazis off one by one as they retreat towards Germany. By the time the predator gets to the last Nazi, the Soviet also begins to hunt. Have the Soviet steal the kill from the predator. You think the predator is going to kill the Soviet but it's more like "damn, I respect that, you keep the skull." Then soviet pulls out a map and points to Berlin.
Engineer it to piss off chuds and "history buffs" but also make it fun and a little more John Carpenter-y than McTiernan-y. I don't really care about canon but if you're a creative screenwriter, unlike me, maybe make some kind of convoluted reference to a Yutani being a general in the Japanese military or something.
I'm kind of hoping it will be like a new Marvel movie and not do as well as the previous one. But I also think we're seeing the nature of gaming transform. We're going from these solitary or multiplayer experiences to a viral, meta experience. People will buy the game because doing so will allow them gain social media influence. Right now there is some no-name gamer youtube channel that will be a millionaire in a few years due to this game. That's already what we have seen. Aspiring influencers latch on to a viral game and then gain a massive following, even off of one or two games. You get people not only racing to finish the game first but videos on how to do things in the game, details, bugs, lore, speed running, glitches, cheats. Go see how many "Details in RDR 2" videos there are on youtube and how successful they are. Then you get the periphery content of visiting the real locations, cosplay, and humor.
There will be a goldrush to be one of the GTA 6 influencers. Then all that hype will drive further sales in people who just want to play the game. Even if the sentiment on GTA has cooled, the increase in social media from 2012/2013 to 2028 will drive interest.
My theory is that Rockstar already knows this. They're designing the game around this idea. I also think it's the present and future of corporate game development overall. God knows what monetization they have cooked up since shark cards and how that ties into all this. The depravity will be astounding. I'm waiting to see if they do any partnerships with influencers. There were also rumors that the game will have a social media simulator that's more in-depth that V's facebook parody. Who knows if that's real or how it would relate to the monetization and real social media.
The assailant drew a concealed assault-hoagie and fired it at the officer, point blank. The sandwich detonated on the officer, covering him with acidic and sulfuric compounds. The sandwich also contained tomato, a nightshade derivative. Due to this, the officer was incapacitated and had to be rushed to a nearby hospital where these hazardous materials were neutralized with a napkin. The officer has been in therapy due to the nightmares caused by this violent, communist attack.
Wolff suggesting that Epstein blackmail Trump for political favor. That's the part which will allow Trump to shrug this off like everything else. He will say Wolff (and the Democrats) were trying to blackmail him. Since the libs welcomed Wolff to the resistance in 2018, it'll be easy.
We have great ammo but now it's tainted because libs can't help but to praise and welcome any corrupt fucker that criticizes Trump, making the criticisms look weak.