Regarding the derive macros, there are a few reasons these are required.
Rust does not have a language runtime (like Java). So certain features that would normally require reflection instead require an opt-in trait implementation. This is part of Rust's "zero cost abstractions" philosophy. You don't pay for code you don't need.
You get the benefit of being able to customize the behavior of those core traits. Rather than doing something simple (and wrong) for every type, like a byte-for-byte equality check, you get to define the behavior that is appropriate for a given type.
The derive macros are just a convenience. You are free to use "regular code" to implement those traits instead.
That's a valid complaint. I've never had issues on any sites with Firefox. If the tides change and I start having issues, I will consider finding a better browser.
I'm not claiming the Mozilla is anything like what they used to be, but the Firefox UX has not degraded in any noticeable way for me that would justify switching to a fork of Firefox.
So far it's just a tiny button in the bottom left corner that can be removed with two clicks. If it escalates then maybe I will worry.
That's fair but at the same time, at least it's a funded OSS project?
I can agree that Firefox isn't always taking the perfectly moral stance on every issue, but I just don't yet see a deal breaker materializing in the browser itself.
I still don't understand why people are recently switching away from Firefox. The telemetry thing seems totally overblown. The ads are absolutely minimal. It's great software.
Tbh I don't think even the most loved US president should be comfortable without some security. The country is so big, there is always some crazy person with a gun.
All I know is YouTube has more advanced ad delivery methods than DNS blocklists can filter, so you need client-level blocking. This only works if you use browser plugins or 3rd party client apps. YouTube's first party app will always have ads.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, this is just my understanding.
I think feminism is a perfectly appropriate word choice for the movement. The focus is on the fact that women are discriminated against, and that is a very specific scope of problems that need to be addressed. Calling it egalitarianism kinda loses the point and draws focus away from the actual problem. I.e. the movement is about solving problems, not about a hypothetical utopic end state. You could argue about what that utopia should look like forever, but the movement has already identified concrete issues that need to be addressed.
Anyone who nitpicks the word choice like in the comic is just not sympathetic to the issue and causing a distraction.
ChatGPT really can't, even when asked specifically to align them.