For indoor rock climbing (probably outdoor as well): you need, at least, two pairs of climbing shoes. One pair will be out for a re-sole and you can use the other. Though, don't buy your own shoes until you are sure you're going to stick with it for a while. No point ending up with used shoes you'll never use again, because you finally decided the sport isn't for you.
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 685
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 685
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
Sounds more like a feature than a bug.
I tried that, I ended up with this weird "Windows 11" adware installed and couldn't get rid of it. There was also a problem with odd programs and advertising showing up in my Start Menu, even after I removed them. Also, my settings would occasionally just change, without my knowledge or permission.
It depends on the environment. I've been in a couple of places which use Linux for various professional purposes. At one site, all systems with a network connection were required to have A/V, on-access scanning and regular system scans. So, even the Linux systems had a full A/V agent and we were in the process of rolling out EDR to all Linux based hosts when I left. That was a site where security tended to be prioritized, though much of it was also "checkbox security". At another site, A/V didn't really exist on Linux systems and they were basically black boxes on the network, with zero security oversight. Last I heard, that was finally starting to change and Linux hosts were getting the full A/V and EDR treatment. Though, that's always a long process. I also see a similar level of complacency in "the cloud". Devs spin random shit up, give it a public IP, set the VPS to a default allow and act like it's somehow secure because, "it's in the cloud". Some of that will be Linux based. And in six months to a year, it's woefully out of date, probably running software with known vulnerabilities, fully exposed to the internet and the dev who spun it up may or may not be with the company anymore. Also, since they were "agile", the documentation for the system is filed under "lol, wut?"
Overall, I think Linux systems are a mixed bag. For a long time, they just weren't targeted with normal malware. And this led to a lot of complacency. Most sites I have been at have had a few Linux systems kicking about; but, because they were "one off" systems and from a certain sense of invulnerability they were poorly updated and often lacked a secure baseline configuration. The whole "Linux doesn't get malware" mantra was used to avoid security scrutiny. At the same time, Linux system do tend to default to a more secure configuration. You're not going to get a BlueKeep type vulnerability from a default config. Still, it's not hard for someone who doesn't know any better to end up with a vulnerable system. And things like ransomware, password stealers, RATs or other basic attacks often run just fine in a user context. It's only when the attacker needs to get root that things get harder.
In a way, I'd actually appreciate a wide scale, well publicized ransomware attack on Linux systems. First off, it would show that Linux is finally big enough for attackers to care about. Second, it would provide concrete proof as to why Linux systems should be given as much attention and centrally managed/secured in the Enterprise. I know everyone hates dealing with IT for provisioning systems, and the security software sucks balls; but, given the constant barrage of attacks, those sorts of things really are needed.
It was kinda thought of in the '50s. Ford's concept the Nucleon was to use a fission reaction to heat water, which was used in a steam turbine engine. One of the issues folks worried about was, what happens in a crash? No, no one with a clue worried about a nuclear explosion, but the release of radioactive material would have been a real concern.
Some of this might change with the use of fusion. But, it's going to be a long time before a fusion reactor would be small/light enough to slap in a car. At the moment, we haven't really demonstrated a reactor which can commercially produce a net output of power. There has been some small scale experiments which technically produce more power than is used to initiate the fusion; but, that also relied a bit on an accounting trick (they only counted the energy of the lasers themselves, not the total energy used).
Also, when you get down to it, this is the ultimate goal of electric vehicles. Maybe someday, most of our electricity will come from grid scale fusion reactors. Those will charge the batteries which drive EVs. Moving the reactor into the car itself could happen some day. On the other hand, considering how poorly some folks maintain their cars now, would your really trust them to maintain a reactor? Again, not worried about explosions or anything silly. But, the release of radioactive material might still be a concern. It's probably safe to just use batteries and keep the reactors locked up in large facilities.
We dun fucked up when we made tarring and feathering CEOs illegal.
Why do you expect to receive someone else's work for free? Part of the reason the web has become so enshitified is that no one is willing to pay for anything anymore. We all expect everything to be "ad supported", and then we act shocked when everything is covered in ads.
That said, there are usually open source alternatives for most software packages out there. They may not have complete feature parity or have quite the same slick UI as the commercial products. But, they do tend to be both free in terms of cost and ads. E.g for image editing, there is Gimp. It's not going to replace Adobe Photoshop in professional spaces anytime soon. But, for a home user who isn't willing to shell out the Adobe Tax, it's a reasonable choice.
But, the reason so much is paywalled is because everything takes time and money to create. Someone has to pay that cost. Maybe it's advertisers, maybe it's a dedicated team of volunteers. But increasingly, creators are asking users to pay directly.
Decades ago, my father would have some fun with the receipt checkers at Costco. After a shopping trip, we'd commonly have lunch at the cafe in Costco. When leaving the store, he'd hand the receipt checker the receipt for lunch rather than the receipt for the items bought. More than half the time, the checker would just swipe the receipt with a highlighter (their way of marking it "checked") without noticing that it was the wrong receipt. So ya, it's complete security theater. Anyone with a modicum of thought can figure ways around it, and it only accomplishes inconveniencing the people who aren't trying to get away with anything.
I think the most surprising thing here is that 60% of networks don't allow any/any. I swear, the number of devs I've had to convince that they don't actually need to plop their MySQL backend on the open web, to allow their web front end to reach it, is way higher than it should be. Folks moved their workloads to "the cloud" and decided that we needed to internet like it was 1999.
I'd be curious to see how they handle the problems which have cropped up with similar systems in the past. Player housing, for example, can be an absolute nightmare. I was actively playing UO back when they implemented player housing, and it was a clusterfuck. You couldn't go three steps without slamming into someone's house and most of them ended up being owned by a few big guilds, because space was at such a premium that no one else could afford one. And with the land so littered with houses, they had to create an alternate world to quest in, which specifically didn't allow player houses. I can also see the systems they are designing becoming a playground rife for griefing. Look at that nice home you built. It would be a shame if someone diverted a river into it while you weren't online.
MMO's greatest strength can also be their greatest weakness: and that strength is other people. The more open and free-form a world is, the easier it is for the griefers to find and exploit edge cases.
If you were to draw a Venn Diagram of the skill sets of salespeople and politicians, it wouldn't quite be a circle, but I suspect it'd be pretty close. Politicians exist to convince you that they are going to represent your interests in whatever level of government they are running for. Once there, they need to negotiate for their policy positions with the other elected representatives. The main difference is that the currency of politicians is votes, instead of money.
Sure, some of them might actually believe the bullshit coming out of their mouths. But, even then, they have to convince others to vote for them and then vote with them. That requires skills like negotiation, and persuasion, much the same as sales. Though, politicians probably have a greater emphasis on public speaking.
This is what I mean by my constant insistence upon "moderation" in government. Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H.L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid.-- President Eisenhower
It seems that this is going to be put to the test.
And this is why we can't have beautiful things.
It depends on what your goals are.
- Ventoy is good for having an alternate OS on a Thumbdrive. Even with a USB 3 device, you may encounter I/O blocking and find this isn't suitable as a "daily driver" OS. However,. for booting something like Tails or Windows/Linux for OS specific hardware/applications, it can be a good solution.
- Dualbooting is a good way to "test drive" an alternate OS and also have a way to fallback to the other OS if you regularly need access to some software which only runs on that OS. This is likely to have better performance than the USB/Ventoy setup at the cost of Windows fucking up the bootloader config from time to time.
- Windows/Linux with a Linux/Windows VM is useful when you know what OS you want to run on a day to day basis, but have some reason to reach into the other OS on occasion and aren't too worried about performance and hardware access in the alternate OS.
Ultimately, it's going to come down to what you are trying to do and why you want to run multiple Operating Systems. For example, my main system is running Linux. But, I want the ability to run Windows malware in a controlled sandbox (not a euphemism, I work in cybersecurity and lab some stuff for fun). So, I have KVM setup to run Virtual Machines, including Windows.
For another example, prior to making the switch to Linux, I had Windows as my primary OS and booted Linux on a USB stick (not Ventoy, but close enough). This let me gain confidence that I would be able to make the jump.
I don't have a good example for dual booting. Maybe something like a SteamDeck where you want a stable, functional OS most of the time; but, have some games which will only run in Windows.
17 and 19 is a two-year gap, that’s totally fine.
Might want to check the laws in your local jurisdiction. In the US, in some States this may be OK under Romeo and Juliet Laws (check your local laws if the whole "kill yourself from a misunderstanding" bit of the story is required). But, some States do not have such laws. No idea if/how this applies in other countries.
Once again reinforcing the fact that "the cloud" is still someone else's computer. If you want control over your data, you really need to look into self hosting. Otherwise, don't be surprised when that someone else decides to change the rules for using their computer. I also can't help but think that the more the internet matures, the more the version we had in the 90's makes sense. Web 2.0 was a mistake.
Did it a couple weeks ago and already received my refunds.Ideally, I would balance by tax withholding such that I owe a small amount some tax time. And that payment would then be delayed as late as possible to provide the largest marginal value for that money. But, I'm lazy and instead have gone mostly with the defaults and that results in me getting a refund regularly. So, why let the government hold onto my money any longer than necessary? As soon as I have my documents in hand, I file.
While it was fun to watch the GME stock shitshow, the fact remains that the short selling hedge funds were right: GameStop doesn't have a good business case anymore.
GME should have died years ago and this is just the people who are currently holding the bag trying to scrape some value off the bottom of the barrel.
I'm going to go with option C with the following reasoning:I'm going to assigned (somewhat arbitrarily) the following values to each outcome:
This codes failure outcomes as having a negative value and success outcomes as having a positive value, with the value doubling for each increase in success/failure. So, the expected value for the 4 options are:
A: -12 B: -6 C: -3 D: -6
Meaning all of the options are bad, but the least bad is option C. And this makes some intuitive sense. You have an equal chance of success or failure and while no success will be all that spectacular, you will also never suffer a spectacular failure. Die A seems like an interesting choice, but you would expect to suffer a catastrophic failure about half the time and that may end your ability to keep rolling. Die B is a slightly less bad version of die A, and may be an ok choice, if a 1 result doesn't result in you no longer being allowed to roll. Though, if you are not able to stop rolling whenever you want, a 5 outcome is likely to be wiped out fairly soon. Die D is just straight out bad. It always results in a failure; so, there is no point playing.