You can delete them?
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 685
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 685
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
Step one: Document, Document, Document.Step Two: Did we cover documentation yet?Step Three: Complain, with documentation, to the apartment management.Step Four: Document.
Recordings such as video and audio are useful. Just keeping a log of all such interactions can help as well. But, you want to have the documentation to prove your side of things. If things go really sideways and you end up in court, the judge won't give a fuck about what you say, only what you can prove. Be ready to prove your claims. As we say in the DFIR world, "logs or it didn't happen". Then, start complaining to management. And document (keep a written log, you probably won't be able to record) your interactions with management. All logs should include date, time, who you spoke with, what you spoke about and any actions which management said they would take or actions you said you would take. If it's an option, keep your communications with management in email. Both the sending and received emails will be timestamped and the headers will provide a reasonable record showing that the emails were to or from management controlled email servers and addresses. And they log what was talked about quite nicely.
Ultimately, the goal is to move this from being your problem to management's problem. And it's possible that your problem neighbor is also someone else's problem. If management has three tenants all complaining about the same neighbor, they have more impetus to take action against the problem. Of course, this assumes a neutral management, which can be an open question. But, this is likely the least costly way to resolve the issue.
So, he finally took Andrew Llyod Webber's advice from Jesus Christ Superstar and popped into the age of mass communication.
Not humming, but I do make noise intentionally. I'm a big guy and understand that I could be threatening to women in the wrong circumstance. I also walk fairly quietly just as a matter of the way I walk; so, I've scared folks on more than one occasion by "sneaking" up on them unintentionally. So, if I think I am doing that, I'll land a few footfalls hard and flat to make my foot slap the ground and alert the person of my presence before I get too close. I also try to give space to strangers while walking. Things like moving to the other side of the sidewalk/street, slowing down or speeding up to pass. Basically, trying to not look like I'm stalking them.
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
And then imagine what is creeping around, above that tapestry, waiting to get you while you sleep.
the rights it licensed to Otherside for System Shock 3 had been sold on to Tencent
Be careful what you wish for.
Why am I expecting to need to buy "energy" or "gems" or some other bullshit "pay to keep playing" mechanic? Likely with some other "pay to skip grinding" mechanic.
Anyone can build a bridge which stands. It takes a engineer to build a bridge which just stands, while not costing an insane amount of money.
That said, engineers throughout history were incredibly smart and shouldn't be discounted.
Spaceballs?!?!
I kinda have the opposite problem. I'll start some sprawling, open world game, get bored with the main gameplay loop and fire up a new world in Valheim.
I never get any responses, until like 3 days later when I check my spam folder and realize my scheduled interview appointment came from some random server that got deleted as spam mail.
It sucks, but this is kinda on you. Spam filters are pretty terrible at what they do. And with everyone and their dog adding "AI" to their security tools, it's only getting worse. There is a fuckton of spam being sent to email addresses all the time. And the spammers are doing their level best to make that spam look more and more like legitimate emails. So, the terrible spam filters and crappy AI are hard pressed to filter out all the crap and not catch legitimate emails. And this problem with false positives is one of the reasons a lot of spam still sneaks through, most of the filters tend to err towards false negatives over false positives. Still, false positives will happen. If you are expecting an important email, you're going to need to dive into the cesspit which is your spam folder regularly and make sure that email didn't end up there.
As for the issues around job hunting, ya that whole process can suck. Depending on your skillset, experience and job criteria, the pool can get pretty small pretty fast. And online job hunting means that companies are getting hundreds of resumes for postings. On top of that, companies have stopped training and don't do anything to build internal talent pipelines. So, if you are earlier in your career, you get stuck in a loop of not having experience, so no one will hire you to get experience. It just sucks and I don't have an answer for you, only to keep plugging away and understand it's a numbers game. Eventually the dice will come up for you, but that "eventually" can really, really suck.
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
Uh, no shit. State backed espionage groups are targeting the communications channels used by their primary targets. What are you going to tell me next? That water is wet and fire is hot? If the US government started using IP over Avian Carrier (RFC1149) you can bet that the GRU would start up a program to intercept the carriers.
This is why many communication options these days advertise that they are encrypted.
Like Signal. You know, the app they were using, as was mentioned in the article, multiple times. You did read the article, right?
It's also not really a bug. It's just understanding that whitespace characters are often ignored and can be used to push a command past the end of the textbox in the "edit shortcut" form. I'm not sure I really see a fix for it either. Granted, I think always showing file extensions would be a good start; but, that horse is so long out of the barn it's grown old and died in the woods. Much like hyperlinks, I think people just need to learn to be careful where they put their click.
You could create one with the normal shortcut editor, which is built right into Windows. As for considering Windows a risk, well yes it is.
Do note that I made a mistake in the original post, but the conclusion was still the same. I forgot to divide the Expected Value (EV) for all dice by 6 (the number of faces).
If you could design a die with average face value of 3, min face value of 0, max face value of 6, what would be the best die?
I'm not sure how to prove this empirically, but playing with it on my whiteboard I get a sense that the die 444222 is going to have the best EV, under the given constraints and my value assignments. The real kicker is "average face value of 3". Given that constraint, you will never be able to create a die with a positive or even zero EV using my values. Consider die 333333 and each face's value:
This die has an average face value of 3 ( (3 * 6) / 3) and we can consider changing any face up or down. But, in order to keep the average a 3, moving one face up one number requires we move a different face down one number and vice-versa. For example, if we push one face from a 3 to a 4, we must also pull one face from a 3 to a 2 to balance out the average. And because the value for positive value numbers (4, 5, 6) starts off one doubling behind the values for the negative value numbers (3, 2, 1, 0), going any further than 4 in the positive direction on a face means that another face will be pushed down far enough to cancel out the benefit of going to a 5 or beyond.
To look at it another way (the way I did on my whiteboard), let's just consider a two sided die (a coin flip). Using the same values for each number, we can consider a 33 coin. This has an EV of -1 ( (-1 * 2) / 2) and an average of 3 ( (3 * 2) / 2 ). Now, move the numbers, but keep the same average of 3. Moving to a 42 coin changes the EV to -1/2 ( (+1 + (-2)) / 2 ) and the average is still 3 ( (4 + 2) / 2 ). The EV got better. So, let's take another step in each direction. We get a 51 coin with an EV of -1 ( (+2 + (-4)) / 2) and the average is unchanged at 3 ( (5 + 1) / 2 ). And going to a 60 coin takes us to an EV of -2 ( (+4 + (-8)) /2 ) with a average of 3 ( (6 + 0) / 2 ). This means that the best coin for this scenario is a 42 coin. Taking that coin idea back to the die, you can think of the die as a bunch of linked coins. If you want one face to be a 5 the one face must be a 2, which would be worse than having the pair of faces be a 4 and a 2. So, to maximize the EV, you want to create a bunch of 42 pairs.
Of course, we could fiddle with multiple faces at once. What about a 622233 die. Well, it gets worse. EV is -2/3 ( +4 + (-2) + (-2) + (-2) + (-1) + (-1))/6).Maybe a 522333, EV is -5/6 ( (+2 + (-2) + (-2) + (-1) + (-1) + (-1)) / 6). Again, since lower numbers get a more negative valuation faster than higher numbers get a positive valuation, you just really don't want to let numbers get any lower than necessary. The 42 paring just happens to hit a sweet spot where that effect isn't yet pronounced enough to cause the EV to drop off.
So ya, while I don't know the maths to prove it. I'm gonna say that the 444222 probably maximizes the EV under the given model.
This is going to be a teaching moment for cyber security.
This really is solvable with a KeePass setup, but it is harder. I use KeePass and host my own Nextcloud instance. One of the files I have up there is my KeePass database. If I need one of my passwords, I access it from my phone and type it in. If I really, really wanted to drop my password database on someone else's computer, I could login to my Nextcloud instance via a web browser, pull down the file and run KeePass as a portable executable (not installed). It'd be a PITA (and there are some caveats around this process), but it's certainly possible.
That said, online password managers make sense for a lot of use cases. I generally recommend BitWarden when people ask me for what to use. The whole "KeePass and manual sync" answer really only works for those folks who want to self host lots of things. And it brings its own set of risks with it. I'm the type of weirdo who is running splunk locally, feed all my logs into it and have dashboards setup (and looked at regularly) dealing with security. I have no expectation that my wife will do that and so she uses BitWarden.
I think the most important thing to convince people of is "use a password manager". The problem TommySoda brought up is very real:
While I understand that password reuse is a problem I also understand that remembering 50+ passwords, because literally everything requires you to make an account, is impossible.
The hard thing to teach people is that, you don't actually need to know those 50+ passwords, nor should you care what they are. With a password manager, they can be the crazy unique 20 character, random string of letters, numbers, symbols, upper and lower case characters. And you won't care. Open the website, and either copy/paste the password or (if you password manager supports it) use the auto-type feature. There are risks to each; but, nothing will ever be without risk. Just please folks, stop reusing passwords. That's bad, m'kay.
Option C "222444".I coded successes as positive values and failures as negative values. I arbitrarily used a doubling for each greater success/failure level and came up with the following value coding:
This results in the following expected values for the offered dice:
A: -2B: -1C: -1/2D: -1
All dice are bad, option C is the least bad. And this kinda makes sense. For option A, you may have a fantastic success, but you are also just as likely to complete crash out. And a "crash out" should happen after very few rolls. Option B is a slightly less extreme version of this, but any gains from the 5 results should be more than wiped out by the 1 results. And those should be happening with similar frequency. Option C is again the same thing, but with a slower circling of the drain. 4 results let you recover some, but the 2 wipes out that 4's benefits and more resulting in a slow decline. And option D is just straight out bad, every result is a failure.
It seems that the only good choice is not to play. ;-)
EDIT: I realized, I made a mistake in my original numbers, I forgot to divide by 6. And this is why coffee should come before math. The conclusions are still the same, but the numbers are different. I've corrected those.
So much this. I was having a discussion with one religious zealot and he kept insisting, "he's your god too" when I referred to yahweh as "his god". No asshole, I don't subscribe to your fairy tales. Though, in a nod to keeping the discussion civil, I limited my responses, to "no, I don't subscribe to your beliefs." Getting upset, yelling or insulting only plays to their ability to project victim-hood. So, it's important to stay calm and keep the conversation rational and focused on the failures of their explanations. You will never convince the delusional to give up their delusions, but you can convince the other people around, who aren't fully delusional, to question the delusions.