I personally find the thinking on this is too rigid. I get putting boundaries in place so people are not abused. But it isn't a moral failure of a person if they don't fit into this box. I work a ton, but it is from home, with family, and supported by a stay at home husband. It isn't right for everyone, and people should be protected from this if it isn't right for them - but there isn't anything wrong with it. Likewise, my maternity leave was 8 weeks, because I was ready to work and my work situation allowed for it. The American system is absolutely misogynistic, but the fundamental problem underneath both issues that we have managed to get ourselves into an economic situation that requires a two income household or to work a crazy amount.
Work-life balance is super subjective (what works well for one person may be debilitating for another) - and using it to make weird jokes like this is probably alienating for many in their audience. Poor choice all around.
Fact. But do the voters understand it enough to vote for an alternative to mainstream Democrats (that actually know how to fix stuff)? Like, the foundational issues are lack of term / age limits, how campaigns / candidates are funded, and lobbying. You canot fix healthcare, for example, without fixing the system that allowed our current state. Having any discussion before the foundations are fixed is an act of futility.
That is because the world is a shit hole run by idiots. This is the perfect perspective for the scary executive look. Your disgust and impatience is justified - go with it. 😉
I have really enjoyed my midlife crisis (which looks a little different as a woman): lost 30 lbs, began dressing like a scary executive, got rid of the imposter syndrome, and give very few fucks. It has been delightful.
The flaw in this argument is that Beingness isn't defined by whether or not someone is on my (or anyone else's) property.
Besides, land ownership is a cluster of rights (land surface, subterranean, air, etc.), none of which are owning humans. Did you know you can sell your land, but keep some rights, such as mineral rights? Crazy! And typically a functioning society has public lands like roads and forests and parks - and because of the way the market works, shops want you on their property to buy stuff.
Is your big complaint that non-landowners (unhoused) have no place to go?
I personally find the thinking on this is too rigid. I get putting boundaries in place so people are not abused. But it isn't a moral failure of a person if they don't fit into this box. I work a ton, but it is from home, with family, and supported by a stay at home husband. It isn't right for everyone, and people should be protected from this if it isn't right for them - but there isn't anything wrong with it. Likewise, my maternity leave was 8 weeks, because I was ready to work and my work situation allowed for it. The American system is absolutely misogynistic, but the fundamental problem underneath both issues that we have managed to get ourselves into an economic situation that requires a two income household or to work a crazy amount.