computational linguist more like bomputational bimgis
Trump was "expected to lose" the 2016 election. Far more than Biden currently is
Trump wasn't carrying. There's your problem. He didn't have self-defense and white boy goated with the sauce almost caught him lacking, but instead of busting it down sexual style he let us down failure style
Suggestions/autocorrect will likely come within the next 2 months when 0.5 releases
It's also easily customizable and will likely have an in-app layout editor by 0.6
The original post is NOT Scots, please don't spread misinformation about the language more than internet people already have. Scots writing looks way different than this. The post is just English with some of the words being spelled eye-dialecty.
Among other things, you can tell by all the English words like "standing", "light", "thought", which would be "staun(d)in", "licht", and "thocht" in Scots (although "standing" could probably be used too). Reading the Scots Wikipedia page in Scots should make it obvious
Holy Shit
Latex pillow. They do NOT lose shape/consistency at all. Trust me, I bought a latex pillow and I pretty much always use the latex pillow now. I use the larger memory foam pillow when I want a harder/thicker pillow, but otherwise I prefer the latex pillow since I don't have to worry about constantly fluffing it up or anything. I still flip it around sometimes to get to the cold side of course, but not as much for other pillows. Some people want "ergonomically-shaped" pillows, which have a bump for neck/spine support, and those kinds of latex pillows exist too.
A lot of people swear by millet pillows and buckwheat pillows (and other hull-filled/non-synthetic pillows) too. What I can say about them is they're firm and heavy (buckwheat pillows are harder and millet pillows are softer), they stay cold, they have a strong smell, and they whisper statistics into your ear when you're trying to sleep (they're very noisy, especially ones using a less soft/less stretchy fabric like canvas or sateen). They're probably better if you want more neck support. People like PineTales pillows, especially side-sleepers (I've never tried them though).
The best praise I've seen a pillow brand get though is Purple pillows, again from side-sleepers, but they're $100-200 and I haven't tried one. I don't particularly want to finance a pillow.
Every time I have to use a typical pillow I'm like "wow this fucking sucks" and I have to fiddle with the pillow constantly because it loses its shape/firmness after a few minutes and stops feeling comfortable. Not something that happens with good latex pillows, and it's less of a problem with memory foam & hull-filled pillows than in other pillows.
#2) Wage growth through WFH. This path is currently so crowded that few have a chance. Hopefully once a few office mortgages are done and boomers with office fetishes die, more jobs will move this way
It's insane how much time and money we waste on just commuting for jobs that we really don't need to be travelling to, and additionally how much we waste on just fucking around in the office without actually doing anything productive (because there's nothing productive to do). A lot of people could free up a whole half of the rest of their life by just being able to work from home, I wager. Whether people realize it or not, the commute (including the gas money and fares) is part of the time they dedicate to work, and having to waste time on it without getting paid means you're getting lese compensation for your time. Some people don't value their time enough for it to matter, but some people (like me) do.
If you average 2 hours a day on your commute, that's almost an entire month of unpaid time you're using on your job (it's not 30 days of pure time if you work an average of 4.5 days per week, but I'm including costs associated with the commute like gas or car maintanence and repair, which for most people would bring it up from the original 20 days to at least 30 days). Most people who don't live in a city (or who have a job a far enough distance away) waste a whole fucking half a month to an entire month every year – 1/24 to 1/12 of their entire life – just driving to work. On the commute alone. I would take a massive pay cut to not have to make that commute, as well as not have to waste time sitting in an office that I could be using with my loved ones or to do the things I enjoy, which a good WFH setup actually allows you to do.
I'm moving to Chicago so I don't have to have a car nor waste that much time travelling to places, and not just work but also to stores and hobby stuff. Apparently this is something a lot of people have been doing within the past few years because of how affordable Chicago is in comparison to pretty much every other big city. Ahhh, gentrification my beloved.
Overall I think we're having a massive reversal of suburbanization/white flight and a move back to cities by people who want to "take back" their time and freedom of movement. As well as just generally not wanting to live in a conservative hellhole.
Herein lies the basis of the alt-right's culture war BS. The entire thing is resolved by accepting that systematic racism, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia, and other forms of discrimination against certain minority groups are alive and well, as well as accepting that that's a bad thing. But most people don't see anything past overt hate crimes (mainly assault) on the basis of social identity to be racism/homophobia/etc. Then, with that view, their rationalization becomes that all racist actions are on an individual level, that the individuals or groups perpetrating killings of minorities are the only problem and they're exceptions which don't appear enough to warrant a major response anyways, and as a whole society doesn't have a problem with racism or sexism or whatever anymore and there's not much society and the government can/should do to stop it. These people genuinely think that, and it's easy to see how you jump from that to "
<insert policy which addresses institutionalized discrimination>
is discrimination against white/straight/cis/male people". To them, it's "systematic racism/sexism/homophobia doesn't exist, and if it does, it's not enough to be a big deal, so any correction to it is bigotry".Libertarians' play on this says that the "free market" would stamp out bigotry because it would totally be unviable, because human beings are rational and the people with the most voting money wouldn't support discriminatory business practices... since, again, the bigots are a few select people who the population would boycott. The class-based private education and lack of public education would totally mean more people would grow up to be less bigoted too. Making it illegal to discriminate in business would only hurt the poor business owners who want to ethically discriminate based on identity!
Then, on a different corner of politics, you have the leftists who genuinely take "no war but class war" as a description of what's happening – it's a phrase originally meant to invoke the idea that we shouldn't be marginalizing groups or fighting any war except a class war, and that racism/sexism/etc. are useless infighting – but some ("tankies") have taken it to literally mean that the only real oppression in our society is class-based, and "identity politics" and working on systematic discrimination are how the capitalists keep us distracted, so we shouldn't worry about that.
I've seen the first view on Lemmy a lot in the past when it comes to specifically sexism – the site's largest demographics (young nerdy men) makes it unsurprising, but it's still a bit shocking to see considering the left lean of the site. I think it's gotten a lot better ever since a few months ago though.
mmm mercury 🤤
It's a Republican Democracy... a Democratic Federal Republic... whatever you want to call it, point is it's both a Republic and a Democracy. They're not mutually exclusive categories. In fact, most categories you can use to describe the structure/type of a government aren't very exclusive categories. Governments are very complex and can be a lot of different things, so we have a lot of different terms (and different usages of those terms) to narrow a description down.
but... the declaration of independence says we have a duty to do it! Surely the founding fathers would approve...
I'd like to pretend I were amused by a pampered white guy doing pampered white guy things and posting "everyone you criticize is hitler!1!!" memes, but it's hard to do so when I realize I'm talking to someone who actually thinks sexism against women and racism against minorities isn't a real issue, much less homophobia and transphobia, and thinks that straight white dudes are the "real victims" of discrimination.
You are the problem. You're a tool. You're outsmarted by the far-right. They played you for a fool. Get professional psychiatric help before you can't reverse course.
Respectfully, you're delusional. Idk how your mind immediately went from feminist gender abolitionism jest to violence and extremism, and what seems to be a rant about how social progress for disprivileged peoples akstchually make our enemies hate us more so we should stop advocating for them, but it's a bit concerning
Of course, as a cisgender white guy you're not gonna be able to relate to targets of constant discrimination and you're going to be prone to be blind to gender-based (and race-based among other forms of) discrimination in our society. It shouldn't be too surprising that you see any advocacy for shift to equality in the social hierarchy as "extremist" and discrimination against your own group. But your comment is bordering on nega-empathy...
If you really care about inequality and you're not a conservative or ""libertarian"" then it would do you a lot of good to watch The Alt-Right Playbook to get a perspective on the regressive talking points you're repeating.
Lol what? You are delusional. I'm not sure Orthodox Slavs would agree that WW1 and the subsequent Russian Civil War were "secular" wars considering most propoganda from that time was highly religious and they were seen as "holy wars" by both Slavs and Germans. The Ottomans literally were a Sharia state and the Sultan framed the war as a Jihad against the enemies of Islam. There was deep religious subtext in WW1 from nearly all the major European powers.
Both world wars were caused mostly by nationalism/ethnic conflict and recent history/economic problems. Secularism had literally not a single thing to do with it. Where exactly do you get this "WW1 and WW2 were caused by secularism" delusion from?
There are pencils like the Uni Kuru Toga line which have a motor to create auto-rotating lead, and the Pentel Orenz Nero 0.2mm which constantly pushes out lead so you don't have to keep clicking. So... close enough?
Brains transmit/change state (a.k.a. think) using electricity. It's basically a flesh computer. You can't read thoughts without being able to measure the brain's electrical/chemical activity. If you had any theoretically possible mind-reading (and by extension mind-controlling) technology, it would still need to physically connect to your neurons or something...
That being said, I don't imagine it'd be too hard for sci-fi future folk to stick a chip in every newborn's brain from the get-go. But that's a future too far from now, we'll all be dead by then probably.
For real. I wish it were these people killing themselves with their stupidity, not others...
I agree but it could be worse (Pop!_OS)