It's a valid point in this case and I'm not attacking your character, I have respect for engineers/designers especially when it comes to reducing pollution.
Rather I am attacking your position, which is not without bias, would you not agree on that?
Yeah, still not radioactive nasty though. Don't get how you are all so naive. The only reason most countries have a nuclear program is so they have nuclear weapons.
Then you are truly a margin case and need to stop shoveling your irrelevant opinion into a greater conversation.
These people that come along and go "EV's are no good cos I live 50 + miles from the nearest shop and I'm not willing to pause and let my vehicle charge for 20 mins when I am there." They are taking the piss out of everyone by butting into conversation and making their demands.
You shouldn't replace a different type of battery with another. The vehicle will be set up with a different charging profile and you'd need to change that as well.
You're right, if they'd have admitted it was because she was li/fo then she could have claimed employment benefits which they have to pay towards I believe. They were criticising her performance to avoid that.
What I see are cables is coming out of a lamppost.
I'm all for electric cars but I can't see a reasonably safe solution to all the cars on the street being connected.
It protects the car, it's a way for the greater battery drain an electric car probably has to be offset. It's like carrying around an extra tank of fuel. It could genuinely save lives whilst electric cars develop. Soo many reasons yes vs weight gain.
Edit: even weight gain is going to be negligible if the panel is implemented like a sunroof and see through. That would be lighter than metal and only the solar charge controller is added weight. Considering there are controllers for charging anyway this maybe less than I imagine.
It's a valid point in this case and I'm not attacking your character, I have respect for engineers/designers especially when it comes to reducing pollution. Rather I am attacking your position, which is not without bias, would you not agree on that?