True programmers know that novice code is a rite of passage. Every programmer worth their salt looks at their own older code and cringes at it. Most people who do this for a living are more likely to give helpful pointers rather than tear you down, if anything.
If someone is being a jerk to you about your code, stop listening to them immediately and walk away or block them.
We use one of these at work! There are a couple of companies offering these solutions such as PaloAlto, Zscaler, etc. and they are typically of the "Next-Gen Firewall" variety (I.e. they scan the content of the packets rather than just routes and ports and such).
The way they work is basically that you establish VPN connections to their endpoints, and they scan the traffic as it passes through. Like a VPN, you get a new IP address that is shared with other customers, but there is a way to pin your original IP in the packet headers if you need.
These connections can be handled via one of a few ways:
Software on the workstation (best option as it allows deeper traffic routing and control, as long as your workstations are locked down)
IPSec tunnels configured on the building's router service's endpoints/datacenters
GRE tunnels configured on the building's router to the service's endpoints/datacenters
A physical firewall box that sits in front of your other hardware that does any of the above OR something bespoke
Note that unless you have option 4, none of these replace traditional "dumb" firewalls. If you're still using IPv4, you still need a NAT firewall.
X11 can only have one scaling across all monitors. You will have to switch to the Wayland mode for sddm, though I think that its still experimental, and then apply plasma settings to sddm.
Matrix isn't super private though. It's halfway there, but compared to something like XMPP, it falls short due to the fact that any instance a user federates with gets a gigantic copy of all of their metadata, and the server operator can do whatever they want with it. So all you would have to do is spin up a new host, message a target user and get them to respond, and you're done.
The posters are rendered in a different order for some reason. In one, the combine posters are on top of the normal ones, and in the other, the normal ones are on top of the combine ones.
The combine ones should be on top as they are oppressing anything that could be seen as good, happy, or relaxing for the citizens.
Once you get a devops pipeline set up, you do all versions at the same time and have the compiler farm handle it. No reason the native versions shouldn't be receiving updates at the same time when its become rather easy to integrate multiple targets at the same time.
Look closer. The posters on the wall are the same on both, but they are rendered in a different order. One is back to front, and the other is front to back.
Does FUTO's license allow me to maintain my own fork under a different name to offer to fellow users, that is no longer under control of FUTO? I'm not selling (commercializing) it. If not, it is source-available.
