Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
679
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • Well, you could say what you wanted to say in other words.

  • Last thing I can say is that feeding the dog references the financing of the AfD by Russia. Please tell me, how is this a problem if the AfD is not part of the government?

  • Können wir zu dem Thema nicht mal eine Grundsatzentscheidung als Bevölkerung treffen? Entweder volle Akzeptanz von Immigration oder eben keine, und dann als Gesellschaft die Entscheidung akzeptieren und umsetzen. Dieses Rumgeeier verbaut uns so viele Chancen.

  • I understood that. But who cares about the neighbor feeding the dog if the dog is not there to protect?

  • But there were quite a number of social cuts and austerity measures that were fairly independent from the introduction of the Euro.

    Look up target2 balance and the reaction of European countries to the special assets of the army.

    The latter made people worry that interest rates could rise. In other words, German austerity was a tool to keep interest rates low for the countries in Europe.

    Without the Euro, those austerity measures wouldn't have happened.

    The thing that really propelled Afd was that foreign people look different though

    Everybody says this so it must be true. Why can't there be real frustration with the established parties and the media motivated enough racists to join. By constantly saying that the AfD is racist, it became true, which disabled the threat of a real alternative.

  • The analogy with the dog doesn't work. The AfD is not there to protect anything.

  • To the established parties, 40% is an acceptable risk if it prevents another new party from gaining 55% of the votes.

  • As if there would be no social networking without Zuckerberg.

    Like any sin, the change starts with us. If we want a healthy social network, we can build a healthy social network.

  • AfD was popularized by German media first. This is controlled opposition, created by the upper class. The Kremlin money and the racial politics were a poisoned gift because they will prevent them from ever gaining the absolute majority.

    There is the threat of a new strong, successful party if the AfD is forbidden. Then a party without racist politics like Volt has space to grow.

  • Thanks for the insights. I thought it was only Stalin who decided to collectivice the farming.

    With stocks for instance the owners typically arent involved in the operation

    Those are not the real owners but people who rent money.

    There are always shareholders who control the board and who make the ultimate decisions. They decide when they want to meet but nevertheless I don't think that they do much more than managing their companies which includes networking. So even when they don't work, they will be 'on'. No pity, they are rewarded more than enough.

  • I should have looked it up before. I don't remember my original source.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Civil_War

    The red army had 6 million out of 280 million citizens of the USSR. So it's a bit more.

    and often the company does worse when the owners get involved

    How long do those companies exist? If owners just skim, I would expect most companies to dissolve sooner than later.

  • Then article 42 of the EU

  • Or somebody else is doing the manipulation and is successfully putting the blame on Russia.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Or British expats who didn't register. Details are needed.

  • NSFW Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • All foreign fruit being very scarce and people standing in long lines to get it, while the ones in the back knew they probably aren’t getting any today? Also westerners’ fault.

    Do you know the history of the united fruit company? That one could be correct.

  • Why should the call for removal not be a smokescreen?

    What is the thing that the upper class does that doesn't receive any attention but should make us worried?

  • NSFW Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Cigarettes and other things of value will become cash again.

  • My point is that the Capitalists manage the rate at which workers learn about the left point of view so that the chance of them reaching a ctitical mass for change is very low.

  • It's definitely not a deliberate misunderstanding.

    consumerism is driven by a necessity for Capitalists to sell more commodities. It isn’t the choice of individuals, but the underlying Capitalist system

    Yes. By the same logic, Capitalists need consumers to stay calm and to not change the system.

    How can the Capitalist system be changed if people don't act on individual choices?

    Finally, Leftists do reach people, with action. It isn’t a “trap.”

    They reach some. Do they reach enough?