I know that cable is not a solution for everyone but most of the humans like to live in communities, yes there's are exception. Wiki says US population is about 80% in urban
4G or 5G would still be a better cheaper alternative, I'm not sure what bandwidth a starlink / whatever other alternative but my guess is that is much lower then a classic cell tower.
Cell towers usually have multiple directional antennas, smaller coverage but much cheaper to maintain. Also can be fixed, can be upgraded to next generation. Satellites are pretty much one time use, can't be upgraded, can't be fixed, if something goes wrong the solution is to burn and send another one.
Obviously there is fiber, copper is usually "last mile". Its cheaper to have a long fiber and short copper. Copper more or less anyone can install, fiber is more specialized.
I'm not proposing to reinvent the wheel, just continue what has proven to work.
Usually fiber is used between cities and in cities and copper is for the "last mile". Usually there is a switching box for the street / building complex
I understand, but that is the exception. Even in your case probably getting 4G / 5G to that area would be cheaper / easier long term. Also Europe has a relatively high density compared with other continents
Unpopular opinion: we don't need freaking internet from satellites, just get cat6 in every home and everyone is happy. I'm sure the cost would be lower then having to launch 999999.91 satellites to have similar speeds
My point was that it can get bad really fast and I'm sure that there are already people who practice shooting oranges and maybe thinking of shooting a bigger orange.
*I'm not saying this to encourage gun violence. Just that probably someone already thought to do a Mario brother on the big orange.
Well good night 'murica. People kind of forget that USA's wealth and dollar as monetary reserve is pretty young, more or less 100 years.
Yes, will take some adjusting but the world can very easily prosper without murica