Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
10
Comments
1113
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Idioms

    Jump
  • Im polish and I don’t know the last one.

  • Are you anxious of seeing a too young skeleton with a dildo inside?

  • I did a couple of times pour acetone down the drain but I did run water at full blast at the same time to wash it down immediately. Guess Im slightly smarter then undergrads.

  • Spooky

    Jump
  • I don’t think we would be able to handle this many „good morning” gifs…

    … and scam calls

  • What have we fucking done. All this global warming bullshit just to get rid of this!?

  • That’s the neat part. You don’t.

  • He made an elaborate test track specifically to make interesting observations.

    He set up dozens of cameras to record interesting observations from multiple angles.

    He collected footage of interesting phenomena he observed as they were happening in his elaborate test environment.

    He then cut the footage up so much it’s impossible for us to say exactly what really happened.

    If he went to all this trouble, and then made claims based on his experiment would it really hurt the video to explain the testing process a little bit more?

  • I want to see more of these experiments in the future. But Marks video is pretty much a commercial for the Lidar manufacturer. And commercials shouldn't be trusted.

    This. If the video presented more facts and wasn’t paid for by competition it would be trustworthy. Otherwise it’s just clickbait (very effective judging by the fact we’re discussing it).

  • Did he enable the autopilot? When? What his inputs to the car were? Is if fsd? What car is that?

    You can make every car hit a wall, that is the obvious part, but by claiming (truthfully, I have no doubt) that the car hit it on its own I would like to know what made it do it.

  • Were is a robust description of the experiment? Or am I supposed to look frame by frame at the screen in the car to deduce the testing conditions?

    All he had to do was tell us clearly what is enabled on each car and what his inputs are. That would solve all the tesla fanbois comments about him cheating. Maybe he didn’t for „engagement”.

  • I fucking hate tesla and elon musk. Also I fucking hate people calling unverifiable shit science

  • All the other assholes who are comparable to him tell him to gtfo because he said the quiet part a little to loud.

  • What would definitely help with the discussion is if Mark Rober the scientist left a fucking crumb of scientific approach in his video. He didn’t really explain how he was testing it just slam car into things for views. This and a collaboration with a company that makes lidar made the video open to every possible criticism and it’s a shame.

    Discovery channel level of dumbed down „science”.

  • Modern large commercial buildings already suck down this amount and more.

    And how mamy cars in said building? How many will be allowed to charge at the same time? Should we expect same grid for large commercial buildings and rural charging stations?

  • No, people often fail to see how modern day capitalism is basically indentured servitude for those at the bottom.

  • Spinning more drama around this project, that’s what it needs.

  • Cringe

  • The alternative under capitalism is death or at the very least being an outcast from society.