Not entirely true. Humans have successfully modified the genome of plants and especially bacteria in a targeted way for years now. But things are of course much more complex in humans and vertebrates in general.
Die USA haben im November erst gezeigt, dass sich die linken Parteien selbst zerstören mit ihrem schwachsinnigen Kulturkampf. Kein Wunder, dass wir wieder mal die Wahlen verlieren werden. Vielleicht einfach mal keinen Männerhass schieben, dann klappt das auch mit der Regierungsfähigkeit?
No, they are not for you to reevaluate because you hold no knowledge or expertise in these fields. Demanding for outsiders to interfere with the scientific process because of their silly little biases and mental disabilities is a deranged opinion.
Untrue. There are small models that produce better output than the previous "flagships" like GPT-2. Also, you can achieve much more than we currently do with far less energy by working on novel, specialised hardware (neuromorphic computing).
Who cares for your funking CFO? No way he's the guy doing "innovative shit that saves lives across the world", it's the guys below him making a fraction of his salary.
This completely misrepresents the issue. It is not about working for free. A salary of a million bucks is just insane, regardless of context, be it for a non-profit, a private company or a presidential office. There's no point of donating money to a cause if it only ends up in the pockets of a CEO who already has way too much of it.
No, it is not deuterium. The thing that differentiates deuterium from "normal" hydrogen is a neutron, while here, we are only talking of antiprotons (without antineutrons or positrons).
You know there's a difference. Nowadays, many people are glued to their phones because of addictive apps like TikTok and Instagram. I can't imagine that newspapers had the same effect.
What an incredibly enlightened comment.