Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
5
Comments
131
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Smarttube next has a fix for now

  • Because the typical standard of consent is that in order to do something to someone, you should have informed consent. If you cannot obtain that, then you do not do the thing. Something that does not exist cannot give informed consent, therefore you should not do the thing.

  • If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state.

    It usually is- to a living organism, which is not what we're talking about.

    Prove it

    Come on bro you can't be serious about this.

  • They are not related because you have to exist to experience well-being or "bad-being". What I'm talking about is consenting to exist.

  • And how does that relate to angels?

  • Just to clarify, I'm not advocating for any baby to be taken off life support, that's a pretty abhorrent thing to accuse me of, if that's what you meant.

    I work in critical care and routinely bring people back from the brink of death. With a living being, unless otherwise stated, their consent to life saving treatment is implied, and I'm happy to give it.

    Philosophically, I'm just not convinced that there is such a thing as an implied consent to "make me exist when I don't exist already".

  • That's just how evolution works- something that already exists and is driven to stay alive is more likely to pass on its genetics than something that is not driven to stay alive. This fact has nothing to do with the philosophy of consenting to exist in the first place.

    Edit: missed your first question. Something that does not exist cannot desire.

  • If my understanding of longtermism is correct, it's more of a function of utilitarianism. If one wants to do the most good for the most people, then it makes some amount of sense to focus on the far future where presumably there will be more people. Their consent is irrelevant, which is kind of the opposite of what I'm saying, which is that consent is relevant.

  • I'm not sure what your point is here

  • Nothing, unless they start existing.

  • Something that no one has discussed in this highly enlightened conversation here is the issue of consent. A person cannot consent to being born. Full stop. I don't know of a way around that besides ignoring it.

  • It's Vermin Supreme's moment

  • Yeah I agree the control scheme contributes to the difficulty quite a bit. Between the dodging as you described and the lack of animation cancelling leading to "queueing" actions, you definitely need to be deliberate about what you're doing.

  • Modern social media

  • The DLCs are historically challenging for sure, but the first few bosses make Friede look slow imo.

  • I'm two rememberance bosses in and having a good time. My main criticism is that the bosses are AGGRESSIVE. They seem to be balanced with summons in mind because you almost have to draw the bosses attention away to get in decent damage. Still fun tho.

    I've noticed some frame rate decrease in the open world and some minor bugs. I'm not sure if that's my fault tho; I bought a fancy new graphics card and cranked up all the settings, and I'm not sure if my relatively older CPU and RAM are keeping up.

  • Swisher sweets but backwoods works too

  • Unless I'm misunderstanding, I do believe it is that simple, yes.