One of the ideological focus of the RAF was antifascism, which had been tolerated by the Federal Republic of Germany --e.g. it was founder of the NATO with other anticommunist bourgeous parliamentarian and fascists (Portugal) states--. Also, one of their most known actions was the kidnapping and execution of Hanns Martin Schleyer, an ex SS Official and, at that time, president of the Confederation of German Employers' Associations and the Federation of German Industries.
Aside from any ideological, tactical or strategic differences that you may have with the RAF. Valuing the organization based on the new ideological position of an ex-member more than 20 years later seems to me to be in bad taste.
Sorry, could you elaborate why this is antisemitic?
According to the official narrative, western Zionist Jews feeling emotionally upset about opposition to a modern-day holocaust is a more urgent problem than a modern-day holocaust.
It seems an accurate description of narratives in some western countries (USA and Germany, at least).
did the people born 20 years ago in Israel (and some of them were against war and pro Palestine) bare any blame for the terrible history that happened before they existed?
They will be in the Israel Genocides Forces (aka IDF) now --at least jews, and druzes and Circassian men-- masskilling people (except a minority disobeying their apartheit laws).
The post was deleted by an admin ^1 and the 'rule 1' should be the instance rule 1:
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Your comment on the Palestinian community, in my opinion, is a poor analysis of the historical and material conditions that have led to the current situation in Palestine. It ignores Zionism, colonialism, and the structural racism of Israel, both as a Zionist political project initially and as an effective state later.
You repeatedly use 'they' in your comment, with these 'they' being the extremists. My interpretation of your comment is that it starts from the hypothesis that 'extremism is bad'. I totally disagree. Often the extremists have been the vanguard of progress (people who believed that the earth revolved around the sun, 'liberals' willing to risk their lives cutting off the heads of kings and bishops...), although they can also be the vanguard of reaction (e.g. fascism).
If points 1 and 2 are correct, the violation of rule 1 is easily derived (dog-whistle, Zionist apology, anti-Palestinian resistance...).
IMHO, this only justifies deleting an elaborate comment if the community is defined as a safe space for Palestinians, they justifiably believe you are trolling, or they are flooded with similar messages. Otherwise, what the admin should have done is down-vote and reply for what they consider your argument to be toxic.
Thanks, I'm not sure if it's better that the suggestions of @pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de (⭐, 🌟) or use some 'gloves' emojis (🌍, 🌎, 🌏, 🌐). But I will try it (⁂)
Except Yemen.