I typically bike downtown as there's a couple of resturants and hole-in-the-wall places I like to frequently visit.
Besides downtown I actually bike in and around the several parks around the city. Fresh air, gorgeous scenery, fellow cyclists, and cute doggies are what draws me into the parks🤗🌻
I thought that Lituania was using a helicopter to surveil Russia where I then had the train of thought that meant Lithuania could do whatever with the intelligence like for example sell it to Ukraine and Russia couldn't shoot it down unless Putin wanted to start a second war.
Holding the use of a less restrictive license against the project because some unrelated party could come along and fork it without contributing back seems like a strange position to me.
While I'm not sure how to interpret this, I can answer the second which might help answer your first statement.
I'm also not really sure what that criticism of MIT is trying to say. Third party contributors don't get paid for their work? GPL projects also don't have to pay people submitting changes.
It's not about payment but primarily about reciprocation:
[Case 1] I have a project licensed under MIT
P1: "Hey thanks for the contributions I'll add your name to the MIT license."P2: "Dope, btw I see your company uses it for xyz can I see what the new project looks like?"P1: "Fuck no"P2: "You're joking right"P1: "MIT license, read it and weap"End scene.
[Case 2] I have a project licensed under GPL-v(2,3 or AGPL-3.0)
P1: "Hey thanks for the contributions! Here's the new changes."P2: "No worries and thanks! I hope the project improves even more.🫡"End scene.
yeahh I'll stick with Krita as it's licensed under GPLv3
The MIT license helps capitalist overlords and leaves developers and users with nothing as the only thing that the MIT license requires is for the user/dev to essentially pay with exposure by sharing the MIT license that contains a list of contributors :/
The GPL license provides systemic trust as it requires users/devs to contribute any improvements to the project back to the developers under the same license hence ensuring the cycle of trust and furthering progress
Usually I would side with you and agree that minority governments is optimal with our First Past The Post system.
Currently however I see the potential for PP winning by splitting votes to be too risky.
I'd prefer voting for NDP as they typically support the majority working class but having PP win by splitting the vote is a chance I'm not willing to take.
I woke up late to vote and damn I'm paying for it
Either way I'm glad to see the massive lineup over where I'm at🤌🔥