Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
0
Comments
174
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I can't confirm that sentiment.

    I have no idea who has been in her mouth, but I'd assume some of them would be repulsive too.

  • I agree. I wouldnt go so far as saying it was off the table as a possibility, but I wouldn't call it attempted rape.

    I don't know what the minimums and maximums are for his actual crime, but I do hope the testimony of what happened was factored into the decision.

  • An article was linked in other comment threads, there was a clear start and an uncomfortable girl who texted her mom with absolute fear of being raped.

    Something a lot more than moving them around may have happened if she didn't send that text. So yes, no clear attempt at sexually assaulting the girls, but the amount of effort he went to.... Doesn't give me the feeling that this was only about a good night's rest.

    That said, I'd prefer the girls safe over him getting more time in prison any day of the week.

  • Health insurance...

  • With his Peter.

  • Got it, so more than disingenuous in your case then. Noted.

  • I see that there is a substantial difference between the two parties, and equating them is, at best, disingenuous.

  • ... Which is the device they specifically mention regarding /e/os in the article.

  • Oof, seriously. And /e/os is an odd recommendation over graphene.

  • "Hulking out"?

    He made a mistake assumption, I provided info, he responded with nastiness, I blocked. I really don't see what you're hung up on here.

  • Nah, try reading through his messages in order. He gets nasty right away, as he did to another who pointed out his mistake. I figured I'd provide some supporting context, he again behaved like a dick. So I blocked him.

    Doesn't seem problematic to me at all.

  • Wow, you are not only unable to accept that you're wrong, you make references to exactly what others have talked about, and then you act like a dick about it.

    Your comments apparently add nothing of value, so... Goodbye.

  • Canonical was the early 2000s. Redhat was the early 90s. Inspire was the early 2000s. Collabara was mid-2000s. Ximiam was late 90s.

    Not only was open source pretty popular, it had a not-insignificant group of companies working on it.

    He's very much correct.

  • Right now it's got some private info in there, but I've been meaning to make it sanitized to share, so I'll let you know

  • Phenomenal, thank you!

  • If you do find it let me know, I'd love to see it! I really do have about 20 hours of training in networking I give to folks, and since it's literally 20 hours of information, I like to put in fun stuff.

    Like a picture of a facemask I added during COVID with "stay at 127.0.0.1, don't 255.255.255.255". Super cheesy but at least it's a mental distraction from information overload haha

  • pruno

    Well that's a new one for me, and I would just like to add... Gross.

    Which makes it very Bannon appropriate.

  • Well this is going in my "basics of networking" presentation.