• 1.81K Posts
  • 864 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 29th, 2025

help-circle
  • What’s the difference between U.S. and Chinese AI for those ‘with eyes willing to see’?

    The sad answer is that Europe and others need to collaborate and develop their own tech. The U.S. and Chinese AI is the same useless crap, with China’s even more (intentionally) biased.

    But this article is about China, not the U.S. If you engage further in whataboutism and conveying cheap Chinese propaganda narratives, I stop this conversation.






  • Why is everyone treating like American shit is any better than Chinese

    I may be mistaken, but the article says both U.S. and Chinese are ‘shit’ if we want to put it that way. At least this is how I understand the content. “America’s quest for AI dominance is scary. China is not the solution.”

    The conclusion is that Europe - supposedly with like-minded democratic allies like Canada, Australia, NZ, Taiwan, Japan, and others - should developed own homegrown tech. This development has already started, although maybe slow, but it’s going on.


  • What Europeans could not build quickly for themselves, due to a thicket of regulations, they often imported just as quickly from abroad….

    Skype was a very successful European company that was acquired by Microsoft (and then shut down to promote MS Teams, a product that is much worse). Mojang Studios, famous for its online game Minecraft, is a Swedish product also acquired by Microsoft. DeepMind was acquired by Alphabet/Google from its UK founders.

    The list of European companies that have eventually been acquired by U.S. big tech is very long. What Europe lacks in my humble opinion is a sense of sovereignty, meaning we need to make sure that our stakes are protected and not just sold out abroad. We needs more laws to protect this sovereignty (similar to those in the U.S. and China).

    I also agree with other views here like @masterspace@lemmy.ca’s remark that American firms are underregulated, but this is something Europe can hardly influence. But Europe should enhance regulation to make sure that technology developed on the continent isn’t given away.

    I strongly disagree with the article in that sense. There is a lot of homegrown EU tech, Mastodon being another example.


















  • Such ‘corruption cases’ have been going on in China for decades, though with a little uptick in recent years. As many analyst and investigation show, however, the fate of these officials may have more likely to do with power struggle than corruption.

    The purge “isn’t about corruption, it isn’t about leaking secrets, it is about a general that became too powerful”, [an analyst said in January this year after a high-ranked Chinese general was purged].

    Observers say that there is indeed corruption, but it is also often a pretext “to make the party a more effective governing machine and a cudgel to remove political enemies,”

    For Xi [Jinping], observers argue, corruption has become a catch-all term that encompasses not just graft, from small-time favours to huge bribes, but much more - ideological impurity, a lack of commitment to China’s ambitions and, crucially, disloyalty.

    They say it triggers one of his big fears: an out-of-control party would prove disastrous for China, like it did for another major communist power, the erstwhile Soviet Union, whose fall he has often spoken about. The possibility of any such decline on his watch would threaten his power - and his legacy.

    The recent purge of two military generals as cited in the linked article, has shown that,

    “Official narratives after the purge of [the two Chinese military generals] Zhang and Liu make clear that their dismissals were political in nature and based on a [perceived or real] lack of loyalty to Xi and his goals” …

    Xi’s circle of trusted followers is narrowing ever more to exclude the very people he relied on to consolidate his power, … but he expects this to “continue to play out until there are hardly any leaders left that aren’t complete Xi products”.














  • It’s at an early stage, but the site says:

    In practice, this means supporting bounded payment-enabled interaction patterns such as voluntary support, paid access to selected content or services, and other small-value actions where privacy-preserving digital payments can be useful without distorting the nature of the platform.

    As far as I understand, you will be able donate to your platform or instance, or an instance may have some ‘paid content’ for which you can use the Feditaler instead of the usual commercial payment services.


  • I am the least person that supports politicians like Meloni, but I don’t support this media ban. It’s essentially a big step to lose anonymity for everyone.

    We must regulate social media, not the children (nor the people). If the content on Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok & Co is harmful - which is what the supporters of the social media ban policies say (and I agree that the content is harmful) - we must regulate these platforms. No one needs an ID to access the web.