It's interesting for everyone, but if the split is US news and World news, this is a US centric story. All of the players are US based. Like I say, the subreddit's the naming convention these communities are based on had very much a "US" goes in news and "RoW" goes into WorldNews ethos.
I don't see policies stating that here. So I think it's a very different situation to the other place (and we can argue about why there's two news communities, but that's another story). But, I was just wondering if the moderation was done in the same vain.
I wonder if not allowing this on world news is a leftover from the reddit split between news/worldnews. In the rules here I cannot see anything that says news = US news. But on reddit the news sub DID have that rule. They would delete any non-us story.
As such worldnews was for all non-US news and in that case deleting this very US centric topic would be fair game.
There isn't that clear cut difference between news/worldnews on the fediverse. It looks like the two communities were created to mirror reddit. But, the rules don't align.
Also, even as a non American. I knew it would be OAN.
I note they make an exemption for the UK. Now, while the UK is no longer part of the EU we do have a version of the GDPR which includes the right of erasure and follows similar rules to the EU GDPR. And is pretty close to "The right to be forgotten". The ICO site about it even references that phrase.
So, I wonder why they think they get to treat us differently. I suspect I know. There are exemptions they can claim to the right of erasure (and I bet they're similar in the EU GDPR). But here's the difference. The UK ICO is a toothless useless organisation they know very well they can either exploit or ignore.
Huh. I am sure you could search for individual books. For sure you could do it by goodreads ID I think? Yes, adding an entire author as the primary way to do things is a bit much for some. I know for sure I have managed to do individual books before now.
Well it is. If you get fined £50 a day for leaving your car parked in a no parking zone. And you get a notice your parking is being investigated. Do you a) Move your car to mean you "at worst" get the fine for the time you were there or b) Just leave it there, because "they've already got me"?
Just because there's a POTENTIAL for some comeback from prior infringements, doesn't mean a good financial decision isn't to pull out of the market to avoid future infringement actions. This is ESPECIALLY so, when there's a new law with stricter enforcement available to the state regulator.
My whole point has been from the start "Just trying to avoid being fined" is a financial business decision. They have multiple options. But the ones that matter are:
Remove yourself from the UK market, thereby limiting exposure to future fines.
Accept you will get more, significantly bigger fines and try to fight them in the courts.
One carries less financial risk than the other. They chose the option with lower financial risk to them.
I'm from the UK and it's not a great situation for us. But, I also think businesses that have a genuine fear of ending up in Ofcom's sights need to start making this kind of decision to the extent that normal people begin to feel the effect of the Online Safety act. Because that's the only time they're going to get the kind of backlash they need to respond to.
But, that's still the same thing. It's a commercial decision to withdraw from the market rather than fight a legal battle. It's entirely based on financial risk.
Like I say, the ICO and Ofcom are letting that fact pull a lot more weight than it should. But it's technically a correct assessment.
Yep, same. Well I actually remember finding the best ways to copy a game on a tape error free first. Some, without protection you could just save back to tape for a digital reproduction (and this also allowed tape to disk conversion). Actually those with non destructive copy protection could kinda be copied too if you knew a little Z80 ASM. Others, you needed to copy tape to tape and hope the quality turned out OK.
But yes, then bringing your box of copied disks (Amiga in my case) into school and swapping with your friends was the way to go.
Which whether you like it or not, is a commercial decision. They cannot realistically vet people for age, because 99% of requests are unauthenticated. Who is going to make an imgur account just so they can see imgur images?
So they made the commercial choice to avoid losing money through fines vs whatever revenue (ad based? I don't know their model) they would earn from UK users.
Now, ICO and Ofcom have their own reasons to play it down in this way. But, they're also technically correct.
It's a real shame because Readarr did work and they really just needed to fix their own metadata servers. No? Or were there other problems I'm not aware of?
I mean, I have to say I've hastened my own demise (in program terms) by over-engineering something that should be simple. Sometimes adding protective guardrails actually causes errors when something changes.
I have a tool that I wrote, probably 5+ years ago. Runs once a week, collects data from a public API, translates it into files usable by the asterisk phone server.
I totally forgot about it. Checked. Yep, up to date files created, all seem in the right format.
OK. +1. -1000. They're clawing it back! :P