Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P

potustheplant

@ potustheplant @feddit.nl

Posts
0
Comments
371
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Not really, no. There are even people that have been able to ADD a headphone jack to iphones that don't have one.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Technically it only goes through 1 dac, not "another one". But still, yeah, your phone's dac is most likely a lot better than the one on a $10 adapter. However, the usb-c spec does allow an analog audio signal passthrough. Whether that's available or not depends on the phone I guess.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Awesome solution. Remove the port that everything used to have and make consumers buy adapters. I have like 5 headphones. Should I go buy an adapter for each one? Not to mention that I can easily fix a headphone cable but if a 3.5 to usb-c adapter breaks, it basically becomes junk.

  • Switch 2 Teardown: Still Glued, Still Soldered, Still Drifting

    Jump

  • I just looked it up on ebay and found quite a few sellers that had touchpad replacements so I'm not sure what you're talking about...

  • Friendly reminder that Tailscale is VC-funded and driving towards IPO

    Jump

  • There are tons and tons of websites where you can create an account with just your email. I wouldn't expect a third party account to be mandatory. Specially from a product like this one.

  • Friendly reminder that Tailscale is VC-funded and driving towards IPO

    Jump

  • Maybe this is a pet peeve but it's a vpn tool that forces you to log in with an "identity provider". Yeah, no thanks.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • You're missing the forest for the trees, but ok.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Except that something being profitable doesn't make it any more or less embarrasing. e.g. Landlords make lots of money yet we all hate them.

  • Anime Recommendations

    Jump

  • In what sense? I haven't seen that one.

  • Rule

    Jump

  • They didn't even correct it this time, so I'm not keeping my hopes up.

  • Rule

    Jump

  • *indie

  • Google wants to make stolen Android phones basically unsellable

    Jump

  • You're missing the forest for the trees. It's one thing to have your phone stole but it's another completely and unrelated thing to have someone force you to do something on your phone at gunpoint.

    How the hell is any type of security system ever going to be able to help you in the scenario you described?

    In case you don't know what your type of comment is called, it's "moving the goalpost".

  • Google wants to make stolen Android phones basically unsellable

    Jump

  • There's a significant difference between your phone being stolen and this random scenario you just made up.

  • Philips debuts 3D printable components to repair products

    Jump

  • you don't need permission from the company to model your own replacement parts. It's nice if they provide the models but it's not necessary.

  • Wednesday

    Jump

  • That may be true from your perspective but it was not my intention. If you make a small effort, you might see that you too can misunderstand someone else's words.

  • Wednesday

    Jump

  • what was the purpose of your statement?

    To point out (what I thought was) a needlessly condescending response.

    Your statement lacked context.

    It did not. I think it was quite clear how I interpreted the comment I replied to. I mean, you got it. Even if you disagreed.

    I rely more heavily on context to fill in the gaps in my knowledge

    Again, I was not lacking context. Having "context" doesn't mean that a sentence does not negate the fact that a sentence can still be ambiguous. I think this is perfectly exemplified in this thread.

    My point stands. People are way too eager to be aggressive/mock other people when they get the chance instead of considering that the other person might A) just have a different opinion or B) they misunderstood something. When I first started using Lemmy this did not happen so it's a shame that it seems to be attracting the same crowd that made virtual interaction so unappealing in Reddit.

  • Wednesday

    Jump

  • I really don't see how "lol" would mean that in this context but ok. Even with the context to me I was more like "idc" or "this isn't important". I mean, if they wanted to say "whoops", they could've said "whoops".

    Could I be the one that misinterpreted what they intended to say? Of course, I'm not a native speaker and (being the human that I am) I can make mistakes. However, the general response seems to be more aggressive than communicative, which is one of the reasons why I started to really dislike Reddit and the interactions on that platform.

  • Wednesday

    Jump

  • implying some form of wrongdoing?

    Well, it kind of is. It basically equates to saying "whatever" or "who cares" when I'm pretty sure the author of the comic would care. They could've just said "my bad, just fixed it" and that's it. But no, they made the conscious effort to communicate that, even though they fixed it, they don't really care about it. Which is, in my opinion, kind of a condescending/patronizing/childish/petty/douchey/whateveryouwanttocallit thing to do.

    But hey, fuck me, right?

  • Wednesday

    Jump

  • Not really, just that they could have omitted the "lol" to sound a bit less douchey.