Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
2
Comments
3187
Joined
9 mo. ago

  • That's what happened. Countries had to join. Of course it's normal to expect people to fulfill the obligations for the benefits. But to rely on this to keep the EU together allows for corruption that will become a detriment for everybody.

    No need to give all benefits. It just shouldn't be necessary to join.

  • Our biggest strength now is predictability and safety...Diverse collaboration on fair and safe ground has competitive and collective gain advantages.

    Why?

    Our biggest systematic risks

    Not lack of speed, knowledge, skills as well as corruption at the top? For a single citizen, deteriorating social systems is a risk, but that is a symptom of lower profits for the products we sell internationally.

    But can it hold onto stability and innovation after tech has been stolen

    EV, next gen phone networks, ...

    nepotism are systemic issues,

    Could as well be the same or worse in the EU. Von der Leyen's messages with Pfizer, it's at the top.

    and bubbles like their real estate construction

    China is a communist country and can nationalize everything. How about the West where retirement plans depend on the value of houses?

    How well off will the average citizen be, materially, mentally, socially, and deterministically safe?

    As long as the US does not start a nuclear war against China, the danger is in the EU. If the world buys Chinese cars, chemicals and machines, how will the EU make money?

    Regarding “above fair price” - the problem is currency and labor cost discrepancies.

    That's secondary. At first it's the collapse of margins if there is competition. If the West builds a mine and can take 90% as compensation, that differs from taking 10%.

    transform into a self-sufficient union

    We always need raw materials and we have to buy them with profits from products that have to compete with Chinese products.

    it’s not missing anything that would prevent keeping its strength and collective citizen upsides/goodness.

    How about an elite for which goodness is not lip service and a population that doesn't close its eyes?

    Europe doesn’t have to produce the cheapest goods or be able to export as successfully if it shifts its economic system and political goals.

    Not cheapest but best deal for a price range. That's difficult, especially with our energy dependency and limited software capabilities.

  • Metaphorically that must be how they see the situation. Elmo and the culture Elmo represents have violated the culture that Peterson and Tate try to reestablish.

  • kosten auszulagern damit man mehr Spielraum für eigene Interessen hat.

    Ebenso die Instandhaltung der Brücken. Das muss aus dem regulären Haushalt kommen.

    Es fing aber schon damit an, dass Wohngeld durch die Kommunen bezahlt wird, damit der Bund die Euro Verschuldungsnorm erfüllen konnte.

    Wer ausser dem Wähler könnte da grundlegend etwas verbessern?

  • The EU should still make quitting the EU possible. E.g. if landlocked countries can't quit because the EU taxes transport too much for them then the EU becomes a prison, not only for those countries.

  • If proven, these failures would constitute infringements of Articles 34(1), 34(2), 35(1) 28(1), 39(1), and 40(12) of the DSA.

    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_926

    https://dsa-library.com/article/34/

    1. Providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines shall identify, analyse and assess any systemic risks in the Union stemming from the design, functioning or use, including manipulative or exploitative use, of their services or related technological systems, or from the specific characteristics of the content disseminated on their services, in particular:

    (a) the dissemination of illegal content through their services;

    (b) any actual or foreseeable negative effects for the exercise of fundamental rights, in particular the fundamental rights to respect for private and family life, freedom of expression and information, the prohibition of discrimination and the rights of the child;

    (c) any actual or foreseeable negative effects on civic discourse and electoral processes, and public security;

    (d) any actual or foreseeable negative effects in relation to gender-based violence, the protection of public health and minors and serious negative consequences to the person's physical and mental well-being.

    1. When conducting the risk assessments pursuant to paragraph 1, providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines shall take into account, in particular, how the following factors influence the systemic risks referred to in that paragraph:

    (a) the content moderation systems of the provider, including algorithmic decision-making and content recommendation systems;

    (b) the terms and conditions of use;

    (c) systems for selecting and presenting advertisements, where applicable;

    (d) data-related practices of the provider.

  • Wenn dein Kind deinen Perso klaut und dein Passwort noch dazu und auch noch dein Verifizierungsgerät ist bei mir langsam die Schwelle erreicht wo den Eltern Verantwortung diesbezüglich zumutbar ist)

    Es reicht ein Kind in der Schule, das Zugang zu einem Perso mit Passwort hat. Wenn die Verifikation anonym ist, kann niemand nachweisen, dass alle Berechigungen von einer Person kommen.

  • With EV, battery technology would have become better much earlier.

  • AUKUS says no.

  • You believe it but you can't rely on the USSR for a disproof. The USSR has an advantage if the US population doesn't push for the technological progress to be able to do spaceflight. Then there are no ICBMs and the USSR is more secure.

  • There are also two centers. One is a balanced society between left and right and the other is a capitalistic hellhole where left and right are fighting about who can shape a good future while everybody is exploited in the present by the capitalists.

  • if it never happened, why would the Soviet Union have let the government win the Space Race?

    If it never happened, wouldn't the Soviet Union be the winner? Why disturb the propaganda of the US?

  • Do pharmaceutical giants not like kicking their competition out the market and securing more profit for themselves?

    Don't car companies not like kicking their competition out the market and securing more profit for themselves by offering electric cars and solar cells in the 80ies?

  • To win the cultural and intellectual battle, Europe must staunchly defend its model,

    There is no argument in the article for why this should work in the future.

    Europe profited from post colonial structures.

    Redistribution is a political decision and possible to continue forever. But was redistribution the source of our prospetity, or just a bribe to buy our silence so that the elite could keep plundering the world?

    With competition from China, we can't keep selling our technology above fair prices. Without those profits will people stay willing to share? Will we be able to maintain culture and education?

  • It could be interpreted as trust in the Dollar if gold starts falling, too.

  • reason: AM: Violates Rules

    Now you know. /s

  • If you run her on your hardware she is a sex slave.