bunches of liberals don't even have a coherent opinion on socialism, they just like 'their' guy doing burns on taco drumpf and for liberals hypocrisy shaming is the greatest and most profound burn of all
the usual shit you'd see in a D or R admin would continue, the cartoonish supervillainy and clownish self-inflicted wounds would be harder to pull off since JD is like a charisma black hole. the direction would still be set by the various several bourgeoisie interests but the internal contradictions of their ad hoc coalition would be drawn into much sharper relief and give it a much shorter shelf life without the unifying figure of a barely warm and slightly damp bag of old mcdonalds that is donald j trump
well her "very religious" family is from the "white supremacist compounds" part of idaho (which i know doesn't really narrow it down geographically but the panhandle has a reputation for a reason) and she's close with them, and blah blah blah liberal electoral politics blah blah blah but she did register as a republican, in florida, last year on trump's birthday and her whole thing is wanting to be a girlboss business lady. even for a
her whole shtick smokes like a pitmaster festival.
at the very least i think it's safe to say she has been heavily exposed to hitler particles from birth even beyond cracker baselines
every time they try to do a ff4 movie they try to sidestep the simple fact that you need to adapt books of doom as a movie first or none of the dynamics that make doom and the ff4 interesting will ever be established.
to your last point i really don’t think that’s been a problem on hexbear. to your question, yes, it’s not as nakedly obvious as fuentes with his neo hitlerjugend shit but tucker is very much a part of the no jews in the country club wing.
trots were a lot more common ~30 years ago or so. swp (socialist workers party) was big (for an american communist party) when i was a kid and in true trot fashion ended up splitting into a number of nominally active and defunct parties. PSL actually comes from that lineage via the workers world party who split from swp. these days socialist alternative had been fairly active though they don't come from the US swp tree. Kshama Sawant was a city councilor in Seattle under SA though i believe she also did a split along with a faction of that party. trots in general are still a going concern pretty much everywhere but with the frequency of party splits and the lack of the USSR as a foil you see where they get the reputation for factionalism and being smallish newspaper/book club orgs.
i think to your first question there's some accuracy there but, taking off my hexbear hyperbole hat, social democrats are common enough even if they don't have the terminology for it and social democrats with neoliberal characteristics aren't exactly uncommon anywhere you find social democrats. democratic socialists being social democrats is common enough to be a thing but it's not a given and for some people this is a sort of intermediate stage. online is whatever, but Communist is a loaded term in the US when you're interacting with the waking world where it's much more rare to hear used as a descriptor and usually not without some meaning behind it. on-the-ground anarchists who use communist as a descriptor are usually anarcho-communists who work within mutual aid and bloc circles, ml and trot leaning people will usually have some sort of theoretical development even if it's nascent or piecemeal. in the US those people are of course rare but that goes back to what I mean about 'communist' being a rare descriptor offline for a variety of reasons.
he would be happy to go, just remember that the first stop is always istanbul