Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
1
Comments
1946
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • the extension of the points-based system comes amid warnings that increasing reliance on drone warfare is not something Nato countries should follow because Russian defences against such unmanned aerial attacks have become formidable

    And right, good point. NATO should definitely just ignore the most effective weapon of the era. 🙄

  • Sure but that’s not equivalent to muscular expenditure - every action costs energy so animals learn to be efficient with their movements and thoughts. Also, an LLM cannot re-adjust its weights in realtime like a brain can.

  • Well yeah, LLMs, unlike bodies, aren’t punished for doing stupid things.

    If it spins around in circles arguing with itself, it has still accomplished its purpose - to generate text. But a real body penalizes you for wasting time when looking for food.

  • Lawful evil. Regardless of their political inclinations, no person should be criminalized for existing.

  • Turns out that much of what the church says is “doctrine” is actually just authoritarianism.

  • Isn’t that the final step in the testing plan for every app though? The first step is always opening it.

    A bug like this means literally nobody tested it at all on this build, or was so apathetic they didn’t file an obvious issue.

  • Vibe coding or no, this is a massive QA failure.

  • Congress has authorized the president through legislation to levy certain tariffs in specific situations, but none of those situations apply here.

  • Worse. He was killed by security shooting at a perceived threat. A “good guy with a gun” who made shit worse.

  • Lmao, Pokemon GO was used as prior art. Get fucked Nintendo.

  • OK sure if you want to be pedantic. The point is that LLMs can do things traditional code generators can’t.

    You don’t have to like it or use it. I myself am very vocal about the weaknesses and existential dangers of AI code. It’s going to cause the worst security nightmares in humanity’s recorded history. I recommend to companies that they DON’T trust LLMs for their coding because it creates unmaintainable nightmares of spaghetti code.

    But pretending that they have NO advantages over traditional code generators is utter silliness perpetuated by people who refuse to argue in good faith.

  • Shoulda called it a rock leopard smh my head

  • I think you underestimate the amount of business logic contained in boilerplate. (Or maybe we’re just talking about different definitions of what boilerplate is). LLMs can understand that business need while most code generators cannot.

  • Well I mean he was always crazy, but at least he used to be merely distasteful rather than full-on fascist.

  • I’m not opposed to the technology per se, but I agree, it doesn’t seem practical in any way right now.

  • I mean, I have one. But I got it a long time ago when it was the only long range electric car on the market. Now Tesla is the absolute last brand I would choose.

  • You’re focused too much on the “inventing” and not enough on the “one time”. A flexible solution can find value even if it’s otherwise inferior to a rigid one.

  • Or even distinguish between two versions of the same library. Absolutely stupid that LLMs default to writing deprecated code just because it was more common in the training data.