Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
17
Comments
1036
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • "Real products, that actually work."

    It's just a matter of which major company starts taking advantage first of the decent amount of trendsetters who already knows it's mostly garbage, and decide improve their brand standing via consumer trust by making fun of it. We're still at the phase where companies are trying to figure out what if any used there are and sift through the bullshit, so they're scared to call it out still for fear of market reprisal or being wrong and missing something.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • How are they tackling the drivers of the downfall of society; the evaporating social safety net, and aggressively underpaying the employed thanks to oligarchs? Foreign wealth buying up real estate? Polluters poisoning the water, the air?

    Will these super expensive new measures go after and hold accountable at all, the wealthy?

    No? I'm shocked.

    Remember, crime is only for the poor.

  • They also are represented by the same law firm who Amazon, musk and trader Joe's use who are suing to have the NLRB declared unconstitutional, attempting to remove a small, occasional road bump of worker accountability on the road to fascism.

    Companies who are supposed to sell tents and canoe paddles, when they think workers are not important, when their entire model is based on outsourced production of cheaply produced, massively overpriced goods, also is the kind of org that doesn't know what isn't important.

    Like AI slop for a retailer.

  • Sounds like socialism for therms! Can't have 'em mixing.

  • Going to outFoX Faux news

  • Don't gatekeep vulnerability. You're buying into stuff that keeps the ultra wealthy in power. Almost everyone is "working class" and is dependent on the same things; employment from a likely crappy company, shitty healthcare, poor education, etc. Yes there are obviously groups that have suffered much more because of race, sex, ethnicity, etc., but acknowledging that life is a struggle--different but still a struggle--for most is a far cry from "all lives matter" which seems to discount the suffering of others. 99% of people can't just pick up and leave and that's a hard economic fact, to say nothing about the other pieces that make relocation challenging.

    I certainly didn't say relocating wasn't right in the face of violence and fascism, but simply saying people "should" doesn't make it any more likely when they face very real barriers to doing so.

  • Making US refugees share tents with the mass deportees and temporarily unhoused immigrants who no longer are attempting to enter the US would be fitting, but not a great pitch for Americans looking for somewhere peaceful and stable to land.

  • Important that this be recorded as the true, accurate information about these people and issues as court cases, science and investigations have proven. Accurate information is critically important and it would be a shame if inaccurate information from other sources were cited.

  • Everyone is vulnerable, 99% do not have the means. Where would they even go? Draftees fled to Canada during Nam, the current dynamics are much different since the US govt is doing everything it can to break historic relationships. Both countries are also carefully negotiating trade pact to include things like making refugee status harder to obtain. Only fair the rest of the world do it, but "y'all should just leave" hardly helpful as an answer

  • This country is sick and no one should voluntarily be coming here.

  • Wait I thought South Park was irrelevant and no one had watched it in 20 years just a week ago, now they warrant additional comment? Interesting...

  • This is it.

  • No, he said torch. I assume butane.

  • Deleted Locked

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Right, and by manual approval it just would be the absolute lowest priority. Kind of like the automated message "we're expecting higher than normal call volumes" as companies gently tell us their margins are more important than their customers.

  • Who do you think will employ them?

    Normally I'd say Spectre, Gru, M.A.D, etc. but I think they've all disbanded as they now have US cabinet posts. I guess they should emigrate to Canada or Mexico and help prepare to defend themselves from the inevitable "security visit" that will start to happen.

  • Deleted Locked

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It's a step. Why wouldn't they default to not accepting any AI generated content, and maybe have a manual approval process? It would both protect the content and discourage LLM uses where llms suck.

  • This induced mans laughter

  • Right, it's why I shared this; the economics of it are undeniable and I hadn't seen or read much of modular building technology in this kind of combined implementation so I hoped it might help visibility for those looking to consider options.

    It's not going to make single home developers change overnight, but if it's safe, decent and affordable compared to the stuff that is currently thrown up it could help turn the tide. That's to say nothing of those who currently are unhoused and don't want to be but the time and materials investment is too enormous for local communities to consider building housing on their own.

  • That presumes the standards of potential beneficiaries of affordable housing. Globally?

    There are many cities, even in "wealthy" nations who have awful options--or none--for people. This could help some, and help ease market leverage incumbent landowners have because development is slow and expensive.