You dont improve government by voting. You improve government with a gin ti its head.
Look at the people getting everything they want from governments not what theyre told they want, what they actually want. They didnt vote in a fuvking think.
Also not be unusual ir weird in any way. Serve. Obey. Grind your bones into dust for your masters. Kill yourself when it's time. Do not be queer do not be trans do not believe in anything do not be disabled do not be nauroatypical do not...
What would you consider though? A couple idle animations? A s>mple-behavior spell? Some other behavior? A complex behavior or type of spells? A quest? Playable characters? An entire chapter of game?
Remember this is fir something that mostly only works for one specific SUBclass.
It's about killing truth and creating a functionally if not literally idealist experience of the world rather by totally obfuscating material reality. That's what all capitalist technology is for.
Orthodox patriarchs, the pope, and scholars of major protestant and apostolic sects need to get together and say 'look, we're barely the same religion, but these guys aren't even close and we would all like them to stop calling themselves christian.'
theyll have to escalate into somehow even more baroque atrocities
Thats why the elites align behind them though. Thats why they get unlimited money and backing. They'll be the locus of the next revolution, I'm afraid.
You're complaining that the game where the wizard who fucked a god and the vampire with an ancient alien brain parasite from the future are just table stakes is unrealistic?
I don't know what to say. Are you trying to say it clashes with the design? Are you saying every game should have every feature and 'StarCraft' should have the nemesis system from the 'shadow of' games? I don't get it.
The whole thing is an abstraction. Doing everything is a lot of developer hours and this one in particular aas shackled to a system made for tabletop play with a human gm, and not even one of the good systems fit that.
Here's another way to think about it: what would you have cut to include that?
It's less than ideal.