Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
0
Comments
287
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Dig up, mate.

    None of this AI grift is meant to be treated as serious.

    The very foundation it’s built upon is energised sand performing explicitly and purposefully inaccurate and imprecise calculations in an explosively cascading sequence.

    How better to describe the result of this than as slop?

    Much like any other religious adherence, I don’t care what you believe and subject yourself to personally, but my threshold for calling out and ridiculing is the same. When those beliefs and impositions are forced on non-believers without consent, which is what’s happening from this hype cycle.

  • You’re defending slop, reacting like the slime in Ghostbusters.

    I’d usually call you a slopvangelical LLM thumper, but I’m trying to branch out.

  • Yeah, you probably should.

  • The ectoplasm is angry.

  • This is just Uncle BOFH.

  • It’s an authoritarian power grab veiled as protecting the children, an ancient play from volumes scribed in clay.

    Social Media, as it’s currently implemented, is an overwhelmingly negative to everyone, but banning it for anyone is a wilfully ignorant and lazy action.

    The legitimate platforms have been gifted an abdication of responsibility to make their platforms safer, and the illegitimate ones have gained a greater potential audience.

    The adult action would be to require the platforms prove they’re prioritising safety above profit, with embarrassingly transparent audit visibility; but this is the antithesis of how government and corporate entities are structured, and such measures are denigrated and dismissed.

  • A healthy, broadly educated population which feels safe and secure is incompatible with, and toxic to, conservative and authoritarian ideologies.

    They need you to be sick, stupid, and scared.

  • Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • Obesity is a term which explicitly defines an entity which has accumulated an excess of resources, to the point of causing damage to itself and the environment it inhabits.

    If obesity conjures representations of normality for you, that’s a function of the gravitational distortion inherent from your current perspective.

    Finally, I invoke this notion as literally a medically morbidly obese middle aged white guy, but I’d easily pass for a medium as a Seppo.

  • Financial obesity is neurotoxic.

  • Any reality where financial obesity can me interpreted as a positive or desirable notion must conjure other fascinating paradoxes, please tell us more…

  • The financially obese are weird, a perfectly cromulent framing.

  • Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • Don’t eat shit, mulch the rich.

  • Advertising is one of the most prolific environmental pollutants of economic activity, and needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

  • Financial obesity is neurotoxic.

  • Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.