Yeah I'm not understanding your argument either. Are you arguing that "you" is not a second person singular in Modern English? It sounds like you are but then you also are using it currently so I'm confused.
But I am asking to the people doing the attacking, but also asking to anyone who has and is capable of launching a nuclear weapon.
Yeah I think maybe sentences like this are why you come off as vague and unclear. Because you just said two different things in two halves of that sentence.
Do you understand deterrence or not? You say you do but your entire line of questioning seems to make me think that you do not. The entire point of deterrence is it's up to the attacker to understand consequences. They're the ones making the choice. They can either not attack and not be nuked or attack and be nuked. That's the choice they're making. That's the point of deterrence.
Because you're asking the wrong people. You don't ask the people about to be attacked if they understand, you ask the people doing the attacking. Do they understand the repercussions of using a nuclear weapon. Because if they attack that country they're going to cause it. Get it? That's the whole point.
All the more reason for him to declare regime change accomplished and victory then no? To say regime change is the guy at the top only, as he did before.
I don't know about number four my friend. I was going through some of my old CD cases of that long ago and there's more than a few that I deeply regret.
The far right are calling them idiots which is the weird thing. You ever pay attention to how those influencers speak to them? They basically neg these kids.
Yeah I'm not understanding your argument either. Are you arguing that "you" is not a second person singular in Modern English? It sounds like you are but then you also are using it currently so I'm confused.