If we're to rely on facts and facts only, I'll argue its internal decision making is itself clearly determined by several factors, most if not all of them being determined causally.
I'm quite sure this addition erases the mere idea "free(dom)" and "free will", which would somehow escape universal determinism, hence creating a special case in the laws of causality for humanity only.
Edit : changed phrasing because I answered after reading your first paragraph. Then I read the second one.
Indeed, I do think the same. What I have trouble understanding, and even with close friends, is how "no inherent meaning to existence" seems to quickly become, in some cases, "no meaning to existence". I always tend to think this slide tends to exclude another possibility. A non-inherent meaning.
I'm not sure what your argument is. I've been working with pedophiles for 10+ years in the past. I'm curious about how society creates and identifies its "monsters", that's all. Not sure you're on topic.
Maybe that's the reason. At least that's what I tend to think. But at the same time, it the rise of pedophilia to the prime type of deviancy looks quite.. recent, if I may say? So something is society may have changed in the last decades/century to make it so?
Honestly, I'll vote for them. But they disgust me with all their power struggle about who's going to be prime minister. In doing so, they're tearing apart the whole thing. They swore that they wouldn't betray us. They're betraying us everyday by showing everybody it's just a struggle between egos. They're paving the way for the far right too with this ridiculous display of inflated heads.
I'll vote for them, then I'll puke. The only frontliner I'm feeling like supporting in the future is, maybe, Manon Aubry.
Tbh, I wouldn't think someone calling you a fascist for voting Biden should be taken seriously. Although, as an abstentionist, I disagree with your strategy. I value other ways to act and can't resolve myself to vote for this kind of politicians.
That being said, we have our estimates of what will actually stop fascists and what cannot. Voting, imo, is a strategy. If someday I'm not able to contribute meaningfully to the type of political endeavors I'm taking part in, I'll probably start voting for this kind of candidates.
My own motto would be "do as you believe us best, as long as you're trying to do something to slow down of repel the fascists. We'll see what was and wasn't effective later"
I don't completely agree with your point but I feel it somehow. The question would be : what would be the opposite of this ? As you surely know, compromise, while crucial, also has its dangers.
If we're to rely on facts and facts only, I'll argue its internal decision making is itself clearly determined by several factors, most if not all of them being determined causally.
I'm quite sure this addition erases the mere idea "free(dom)" and "free will", which would somehow escape universal determinism, hence creating a special case in the laws of causality for humanity only.
Edit : changed phrasing because I answered after reading your first paragraph. Then I read the second one.