Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
2
Comments
255
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • That was kinda my point. If qt breaks them again and arch updates and links the new QT are they going to come after them too? The position OBS took on this originally seemed like an open source disaster. It sounds like they moderated to something reasonable and that's great.

  • This whole thing has been kinda wild. Every Linux distro bundles obs linked against their own libraries. Because fedora did it in a flatpak it was suddenly a problem?

    I get developers being frustrated by buggy downstream builds flooding their queue with useless reports. They ain't got time for it and can't do anything about it. But this is open source software and obs had a bad take on distributing it IMHO.

    Glad fedora was able to talk it out with them.

  • "Man we really got trounced in that election "

    "Yeah we should really work on our image"

    "Yeah. Oh I know! You know how everyone hated that tik tok ban?"

    "Yeah?"

    "Well what if that, but more!"

    "But people hated the ban...."

    "Oh right, no, the movie industry is paying us to do this."

    "Oh why didn't you just say so."

  • This keeps getting better! Tell me more!

  • Nuclear though, never had a problem with excess heat at one of those. /s

  • Not a lawyer and haven't seen the lawsuit but I've watched a lot of legal eagle and other lawyers and I suspect it's not about them manipulating codes. I also doubt this is the sort of case trying to set a precedent in any legal sense.

    Likely it's just boring fraud because they deceived content creators and users with lies to make money.

    A different company doing the same thing but being honest might be unethical and terrible but probably wouldn't be sued.

  • It's funny because it's true.

    But also av1 is open and widely available and based on Google's vp9 so... Maybe it will work out.

  • Maybe not going to celebrate but I am all out of pity and tired of it all so several million people first on the compassion list.

  • Isn't that the one we learn Wesley can warp travel with his mind?

  • Well it's a new systemd release so probably.

  • All you have to do is use powershell. maybe the worst shell ever created. Though some of these AI enabled shells have me second guessing that opinion.

  • Right? Though I've often found those statements to be used to imply you can't vote for the party because it's a "treat".

    My intended joke was poking at this and it either didn't come across or really hit a nerve based on the votes.

  • Do I detect a nuanced opinion. You do realize you're posting on the Internet about American politics right?

  • Yeah we're the freest state in the union as long as your chosen freedom conforms with the Republican agenda.

  • I guess I don't see the difference. If you are warning someone with a gun, the warning is that they willl use the gun. Legally that might not always be "terrorism" but the effect is the same so seems like we call it what it is.

  • I understand I might not be asking the right person but what's the difference between terrorism and a warning when it involves deadly force?

  • I'm confused. Did I miss understand your wording?

    100 - 77 = 23; 23% < 33%

    77 - 10 = 67 point lead

    Admittedly the way we talk about a "point lead" is confusing and it's always useful to look at what the real numbers are and what they actually mean.

  • I would have guessed the same as others that it was interactions between the nozzle and the bed or some texture on the bed. Especially since we don't see any normal extrusion lines which are normal on the first layer.

    Since you're confident it's not, are there artifacts elsewhere on your prints that might be a clue? Is there anything going on with your nozzle? Maybe some wear, chips,or inconsistent flow? If you print just the first layer what does it look like from the top? Does it help describe what we're seeing?

  • That doesn't exist in the mobile nightly.

    But honestly that's no problem and I hadn't noticed because I just pin things to the new tab window.