"It's misogynist tropes. As is the 'monogomy ain't natural' bs."
Oh wow. You've got that completely backward.
If there is anything misogynist about relationship styles, it's trying to control what someone else does with their body. Does that sound like monogamy or non-monogamy to you?
Strip away the propaganda and the fascists, and 99% of who's left would support that change. Unfortunately we've let them reach critical mass and they're not known for going away peacefully.
The fact that the premise was proposed at all makes me think someone noticed a correlation and wanted to assess whether there was causation. As proving that could ultimately help with fixing the problem.
Maybe they discover that the "attractive" group largely consisted of subjects with any of traits A, B or C, and what do you know, there's a very high correlation between trait A and endometriosis.
Maybe some years later it's discovered that trait A and endometriosis have a common cause, some specific gene perhaps. That would be key for fixing the problem.
Bears don't need muscle, unless I am misinformed. I think they just need to be large; whether by muscle, fat or a combination is irrelevant